Prescription Medication Knowledge Base » Of Flovent And » PAS, I think
PAS, I think
Question:
"Kevin" <sevenths…@hotmail.com
wrote in message
news:MPG.14c266efb4650b0c9896bb@news.ntlworld.com…
Thanks for that story TC – what a tough decision, but it’s obvious that you had to do it. Providing a frame so that two other adults can ignore the mess they’ve made is not much of a life – and not really fair to anybody.
Sigh. You’re missing something rather significant, though. TC left because she was in a bad relationship with an abusive alchoholic. She needed to leave that relationship for her own health, safety and state of mind, if nothing else, and it was impossible to do so and still salvage the relationship with her–for all intents and purposes–stepdaughter. I’ve heard this type of advice from many of you–three this week, that I remember; I think nearly *all* of you at one point or another. And I *know* that your advice comes from your concern for me, and I love you for that concern. But one of these days I’m going to be what appears to be one of those spontaneous combustion cases–they’re going to walk in and find char and ashes all around my computer chair and nothing else damaged. So please let me re-iterate and get out everything that I need to say, one last time. And then I have to stop discussing this with you all, because it exhausts me to have to explain myself over and over and I just cannot do it anymore. You folks want me to leave a perfectly good friendship with a person who just happens to be my ex-husband because *you* think I need to. I disagree. If DH was a female roommate, would you all say that it was impossible for me to have a life while living here with her? What if she had a child that I helped her with? My friend’s best friend is a single mother and so my friend spends a lot of time and effort helping her raise her son. Should she walk away too? Because she has no ties to this child and needs to get on with her *own* life? Merrie once asked me why I would continue a relationship that wasn’t going anywhere? I remember it because it seemed like such a bizarre question to ask about a friendship. Are your friendships "going" somewhere? Are they all leading to marriage? Because if they are, I think you’re right…I need to get new friends. All of your concern hinges on the fact that he’s my ex-husband and this doesn’t follow the traditional divorce pattern, so everybody wants to tell me that it’s wrong or unhealthy. I never got my copy of The Big Book of Divorce, but I’ll tell you something…I consider mine pretty successful. I have everything that I set out to have at the time that I left DH–things I never thought I would have again. And I don’t feel that I’m losing *anything* in the process. So if you’re all just holding your breath, waiting for the day that I cut off all ties with DH and stepson for no reason other than "so that I can get on with my life", I think you’d better find a new hobby. I *have* gotten on with my life and, thankfully, have managed to keep one of my best friends and a relationship with the child that I love. You folks need to understand and appreciate that I’m not going anywhere anytime soon…and when I do, I won’t be going far. I’ll still be best friends with DH, and will still be special friends with my stepson. Until such time that something unavoidable happens–like a new woman in DH’s life–this is the way that things will continue. Because *I* want it to. And, currently, so do DH and stepson. It’s unorthodox, and I completely appreciate your not understanding it. But socially, right now, I feel 100% fulfilled, just the way things are, and I have no desire to change it. Get me a job and shave five years off my age, and I’d be very, very happy with my life right now. I know an awful lot of parasites–people who’s only concern for me is my ability to do things for them. I just had this discussion earlier this year with Merrie, when I was trying to end a friendship with a person I no longer valued as a friend. I’m currently dealing with two others–one being Roomie–and I’m just keeping my head above water with them, trying to see if there’s anything left to salvage. The idea of leaving a wonderful, fulfilling friendship for absolutely no reason is ludicrous. When I left DH, I told my brother that my mom was worried about what the family would say. He turned to me and said, "Leslie, anybody who was at that wedding would *not* be surprised that it turned out like this." And it’s true–I never heard a word from anybody at my wedding. My distant family, however, all think that I *need* to go back to him. My distant friends think I *need* to cut off all ties with him completely. The people who really know me and have actually met DH and I are all happy that things have turned out so well and that everyone is happy with the current situation. What do you think that says? I’m not one of those people who think that support means agreeing with everything I say and do. You’ve given me your advice and I’ve read it, understood where it was coming from, and appreciated it. But I have to do what’s right for me and, having explained that all before, I cannot keep going in this same circle. lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
You know, it’s not a hive mind here.
Buzz. (Snicker.) For some reason, that line of yours cracked me up, Anne. I was kind of wondering where you were – I like to read something funny everyone now and then on here. ~~~~~~~~~~ Geri ^ ^
’ ’ <
"There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast."- Anonymous ~~~~~~~~~~
Response:
"Jennaii" <jenn…@aol.com
wrote in message
news:20010110193658.15383.00000587@ng-fu1.aol.com…
Personalities – they already know they won’t kill each other and can
accept
their idiosyncrazies.
Here’s a funny little story. When I moved to Toronto, I moved in with a cousin of my mother’s. She had a spare bedroom that she rented out to college students and it was available at the time. I’d never met her before and she was *very* nice. I asked her how much she wanted for it and she said, "Well, you just get to Toronto and get yourself a job. Then we’ll talk about rent." The third day I was there, I found a note that said that my rent for that month was to be $240. When I found a job, she would raise it to $280. And if I started eating more than I already was (I hadn’t touched a single item of food), she’d have to look into that as well. We lived in an apartment and the kitchen was tiny, but it was mostly taken up by a large, full-sized deep freeze. Everything was frozen. I would buy groceries, put them away, and the next day I’d find them in the freezer. Bread, cheese, milk…she thought that things that were frozen lasted longer and so she took the liberty of doing such with my things as well. She never slept. One night I woke up to hammering on the bathroom wall, which was the same as my bedroom wall and right next to my head. I woke to find that she’d turned our blue bathroom into a pink one. The woman had painted and wallpapered. We had this frilly pink shower curtain and pink towels and rugs. There were little wicker hats and flowered pictures hung on the wall. I mean, this woman had been *really* busy during the night. She would turn straight from Jeckyll to Hyde. One night she talked me into attending the Thanksgiving services with her and her family (which, as we all remember, is my family as well). I really didn’t want to, but the kids begged me not to make them suffer alone, so I went. After *several* hours of service, they decided to break before starting the sing-along. Her son was taking the kids home, so I arranged to have him drop me off on his way. When we met up with my cousin in the lobby, she said, sweetly, "You don’t mind staying, do you Leslie?" I told her that I thought I had better be getting home, and she snapped, "Well, how do you think you’re going to get there???" She hated men. She was constantly taking messages from my boyfriend that she never passed on and would tell me that he was seeing other women. Men were responsible for everything bad that ever happened–except in the case of her sons. With them, it was all their ex-wives’ faults. The worst part was her cat. The woman worked a full-time job during the day, a part-time job most evenings, and went away every weekend, all weekend. But she had a cat. Now before you ask why I didn’t just let it into my room, I deathly allergic to cats. Other people’s cats don’t bother me as much, but I cannot have them in my sleeping area for any real length of time. So although she left her bedroom door open and the cat otherwise had the run of the entire apartment, it would park itself outside my door all night and *howl*! I needed to get my rest so that I could work in the morning, so eventually I got myself a squirt gun. Pretty soon the cat could recognize by the sound of my bedsprings that I was getting up and he’d take off like a shot. Of course, he always came back. One day I made the horrible mistake of telling my cousin that the cat seemed to have fleas. Thus began the flea baths. She would douse the cat in flea solution and then lock it in the bathroom (which, as we all remember, is right behind my bedroom wall). All night the cat would howl and pound on the door. "MREOWWWW!!! Thump, thump, thump, thump, thump." The first night a really horrible thought hit me–I had seen that the doorstop had been taken off the door and I’d replaced it. One of those spring doorstops, with the rubber end. So I laid there in bed, praying, "Please don’t find the doorstop! Please don’t find the doorstop!" The next second I heard, "MREOWWWW!!! Thump, thump, thump, thump…PE-TWANG!!!!!" The bloody cat found the doorstop. Are we starting to get why I don’t want anymore surprise roommates? :-)
And he is "fine" with this situation.
<smile
Well, I don’t know about "fine", but he knows about it and he’s still here. I think he knows that until he makes me a better offer he doesn’t have much right to complain! lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
I think it’s possible to just be good friends with your exhusband and live together as JUST GOOD FRIENDS. This would be, in my mind, a "roommate" situation. And if that roommate had a small child I cared about I would certainly voice my opinion. As I would if it were my nieces or nephews or SD. And if I felt the child’s wellbeing was at stake I would certainly feel comfortable venting here about it. And there are other benefits to this arrangement too: Financially for one. (*I* cannot live on what I make. Period, the end.) Safety – my best roommates were men who were just friends. My parents approved because they didn’t want me living alone and they liked that there was a "man" around. Personalities – they already know they won’t kill each other and can accept their idiosyncrazies. Lil HAS "moved on". She has a boyfriend. And he is "fine" with this situation. Please keep posting Lil, and hugs.
If you have no interest in helping me work through it or find other options, it’s probably best if you all tell me that right now.
"This time: gonna do it RIGHT!" — Bob Seger Jennaii
Response:
"Anne Robotti" <arobo…@fastpointcom.com
wrote in message
news:3A5CD921.74D7DE5D@fastpointcom.com…
You know, it’s not a hive mind here. Some people probably are interested
in
helping you work through it or find other options. Some probably aren’t.
If
you can get something out of the board or contribute something, great. I
think
you’re getting in trouble because you’re thinking that everybody feels or
thinks
this or that about your situation, which is not true. I mean, I think it’s
hurting
your feelings and you’re missing out on some stuff.
Oh no, definitely…I didn’t mean to imply that at all. I know of a number of people who fully appreciate my situation, others who seem to straddle the fence and come down on whichever side seems to apply at the time, and then–of course–others still who think I’m dead wrong. I’m feeling a little displaced is all, Anne. Actually, I’m feeling a *lot* displaced. I don’t necessarily belong here anymore, and I feel it. But I don’t belong anywhere else, either, so I stay. But when it looks to me like the majority of the others feel that I’m in the wrong place as well, I have to seriously rethink the situation.
I didn’t know there was a specific issue you were looking for help with
right
now. Is it the medicine thing?
No, the medicine thing was a vent. I was frustrated–very frustrated. As I said to Melissa, I’d feel the same about any child that was being unecessarily medicated because the mother wanted a scape goat. If I lived in a house, I’d probably walk into the bathroom, lock the door and scream and scream until I got it all out of my system. As it is, I live in an apartment and I couldn’t complain about the idiots downstairs if I started making more noise than they do. So, since you guys knew about it all, I did my screaming here. Then I painted a smile on my face, turned around and said, "Has <stepson
had his medication yet?" I keeps me from becoming a
shrew. It makes my living arrangement a lot more comfortable when I’m not screaming to Rob about something that I already *know* is not really my business (although, as I said to Melissa, as soon as I feel it oversteps the line between unecessary medication and abuse, I firmly believe it becomes my business). And just maybe I was hoping for a comment or two like Jennaii’s, when she said that she thought that biomom should be medicated. :-)
What if my advice would be, "Let SS’s parents deal with this and here are the ten reasons I think that’s what I would do
in
your situation"? Should I not post that? Or are you just asking for more
sen-
sitivity?
I’d like to think that we all know that I don’t come here to be stroked–I’ve never asked for it and I can’t recall ever expecting it. Most of my favorite responses have come from you, Kim and Jane Lawrence, and none of you can be accused of being overly subtle. :-) I’d *like* to know your top ten reasons for letting his parents deal with it. Unless they’re all "IT’S NOT YOUR BUSINESS", that will give me ten things to chew on for awhile. And in the end, you might very well find me agreeing with you. It might seem hard to believe, but I’m not interested in making excuses for myself. I’m hard headed and unbelievably stubborn, but I welcome having a flip-side of things pointed out to me. If I didn’t, I wouldn’t be here. At any rate, my comment to Melissa was sort of generic and–short of someone dealing with Roomie for me–there *is* nothing in particularly I’m looking for right now. But I will admit to being a little nervous about the next time I am. lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
lilblakdog wrote:
The point to this post was exactly that. This option doesn’t work for me. If you have no interest in helping me work through it or find other options, it’s probably best if you all tell me that right now.
You know, it’s not a hive mind here. Some people probably are interested in helping you work through it or find other options. Some probably aren’t. If you can get something out of the board or contribute something, great. I think you’re getting in trouble because you’re thinking that everybody feels or thinks this or that about your situation, which is not true. I mean, I think it’s hurting your feelings and you’re missing out on some stuff. I didn’t know there was a specific issue you were looking for help with right now. Is it the medicine thing? What if my advice would be, "Let SS’s parents deal with this and here are the ten reasons I think that’s what I would do in your situation"? Should I not post that? Or are you just asking for more sen- sitivity? Anne
Response:
"Melissa " <laa…@aol.comspamfree
wrote in message
news:20010110112100.12429.00000803@ng-mh1.aol.com…
Are you this involved with any of your friends kids? Would you ever feel comfortable doing
that? No and yes…which is the reason I’m not. I have one close friend who has children. I was there from day one with the oldest–spending days holding and feeding and cuddling, so that my friend would be able to sleep or shower or do whatever it is she needed to do. I’ve had an extremely strong bond with him from the first moment I saw him in the hospital. I have all kinds of problems with the way my friend raises him and it’s caused some very ugly moments. So I meet my friend for lunch when she’s working and stay away from them as a family.
If you and Dh are truly just friends than your role in his son’s life is alot less than your role as his
stepmom. Of course it is. And I’ve adjusted it accordingly.
There are certain things that no matter how hard the are for you to let go
of
are not yours to deal with any more, and what medication your friend puts
his
son on is one of them
This isn’t true. If the neighbors were beating their children, it would be my business. When I have knowledge of a circumstance where I know that a child is receiving incorrect and possibly harmful medication *because his mother orchestrated it that way*, I see that as my business too. I’m not saying anything to DH, but if I notice significant negative changes in stepson’s behavior, or find alarming new information about the drug, you’d better believe that I’ll be sending a letter outlining my concerns to social services.
If she were your former lover I would. You and Dh aren’t just friends but friends that used to be married. the dynamic of the relationship is automatically going to change. You are not merely friends you are friends
that
shared a marriage. It’s not the same thing, and can’t compare.
No, *you* see it as not the same thing. *I* don’t. I don’t go along with the idea that what is one way for some people *has* to be that way for everybody. I’m the only one who knows what sort of role our relatioship played in my life and the impact that it made.
I can almost guarentee that you would not have the same emotional
attachment to
that child that you would with SS.
You’d be wrong. I have very much the same attachment to my best friend’s oldest child, as well as the two boys I’ve been involved with for the last 18.5 years.
Because Lil many of us don’t view your relationship with Dh as a
friendship. Again, this is not my concern. *I* do view it that way.
you still live with him, still refer to him as DH and not DF, still think
of SS
as your SS and not the son of your friend.
So this is where the problem comes from? Because I still refer to him as DH? Well, I do it for sake of clarity, as I’ve pointed out to you before. But since it’s obviously still a concern, from now on he’ll be Rob. But don’t expect me to use a child’s name or start referring to him as "the son of my friend". If everybody wants me to switch over to "Chuck" or "Bob" or something, because it’s easier for everybody to deal with, I’ll be more than happy to.
The fact that your friends with you ex is not wrong and unhealthy, the
fact
that you two might still be playing husband and wife in some cases might
be
unhealthy.
GOOD LORD, where on earth do you get this idea?????????? The very idea that Rob and I play husband and wife is ludicrous…anybody who’s actually seen us together (Nikki, for instance) will be happy to back that up. I *myself* have a hard time imagining what things were like when we were more than friends, it so far from my mind. Rob is Rob. I am me. We’re a better option for each other than living alone. It doesn’t mean we have illusions of playing "husband and wife". A good 60% of our problem was that I didn’t *want* to be married…I’m sure as heck not going to fantasize about it now!
Your continued involvement in SS’s life, might be unhealthy for your own psyche.
I grew up in a neighborhood where I was raised by over two dozen families, as well as certain teachers and church members–not to mention extended family members and friends. A lot of those people were from other countries, like Italy, Scotland, Fiji and the Philapines. A couple of them were commune households of hippies. One house was primarily First Nation. Some would play music or make crafts; others would just watch television and talk. One even taught my friend and I summer school, when we were out for vacation. I consider myself very fortunate to have that kind of input in my life. I’m not black and white–I’m rainbow coloured. So if you want to tell me that putting an effort into making a difference in a child’s life might be unhealthy for my psyche, you’ll have to excuse me for disagreeing whole-heartedly. I can’t think of anything else in the world that’s more fulfilling.
No Lil. What you do with DH and SS really doesn’t matter much in the
grand
scheme of my life, but when you post you have to expect that we’ll have opinions about all of this.
Yes. And when I say that option doesn’t work for me, I expect people to understand that. If they have nothing further to suggest, so be it. Perhaps there’s another option, though, that they can suggest. The point to this post was exactly that. This option doesn’t work for me. If you have no interest in helping me work through it or find other options, it’s probably best if you all tell me that right now. lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
The point to this post was exactly that. This option doesn’t work for me. If you have no interest in helping me work through it or find other options, it’s probably best if you all tell me that right now. lil —
Whoa Lil!!! I am so sorry that this has strayed so far from your original issues. It seems that the main focus for ‘a few’ has become re-defining lil’s relationship with DH, and SS… I realize that this may or may not make a whole lot of difference to you, but I personally admire you for the role that you have ‘chosen’ to take in your SS’s life. I would almost equate your role as a very active aunt, and friend. (not that it is my job to define anything in your life) it seems to be easier for me to equate you and DH as brother and sister when I read your posts. We know that there are others on this board, like Jana who has a nephew that she cared for and had to deal with issues of her brother, and her nephew. I did not ever hear anyone say that she should step out of her nephews life. Then there is me with my Step Grand-daughter, where most were telling me I should try to get primary custody of her (although that has several difficulties in itself). It was never suggested to me that I should just abandon her to the elements. Maybe I am a bit more open minded than some (not all), because of my upbringing. I was brought up around a very eclectic group of people, ranging from (what other people might call) dirty bikers (yes, actually a few of them did not bathe very often), stunt men, etc… My mother was one of the few Women in the 70’s, and 80’s who actually owned and maintained her own Harley Davidson. To going to fancy balls in Beverly Hills, Movie stars, and some people in very high political offices. My Aunt owns an NFL Football team, and my oldest sister ran for Lieutenant Governor of California. I would honestly say that what ever works for you, then so be it!!! I have a best friend in my life right now, that has been involved with my life and family for the past 6 years, she has known my daughter since she was two, and she is known to all around us as Aunt ****. I turn to her for advice on many things, even though she has never had children of her own I would be ’shocked’ if she saw something going on in DD8’s life and did not say anything about it, or try to do anything about it. She has a ‘very’ strong connection to DD8 (and a very strong personality to boot), and I respect her opinion greatly. There was a time when I was very ill, and I could not even walk to the bathroom my self for several months, and this woman kindly came into my home, and took over all of the things that I was not able to do. I could not even pick my daughter up to give her a hug, and this lovely woman came in and gave a large piece of her heart to us and generously gave something to my daughter that she desperately needed at the time. We have since have had many re-defining moments in our lives, from being friends, to her being my employee, and friend, to her becoming a primary caregiver to my child, to her getting together with a man who has children moving into a new relationship with him , gaining step children, having to not work for me anymore, and being friends again. I miss our daily interaction sometimes, and I accuse her of ‘abandonment’ when she is particularly busy, but I would not change her for the world!!! In many ways your strength, and caring heart remind me of her
I can speak for myself, and I am sure that there are others who agree, when I say that I would be more than willing to help you try to work through your difficulties, and look for other options in your situation. Nothing in life is ever black and white, besides I think I prefer rainbows anyway
And just for good measure, because it sounds like you really need it I am sending bunches of (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((HUGS)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) )))))) your way!!!!!! — Victoria… ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ http://www.emerysdiesel.com ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ When you think you have no chance at getting what you want, you probably won’t get it, but if you believe in yourself, you probably sooner or later will get it.
Response:
<T.C.
wrote in message news:3a5a57e5.932923110@enews.newsguy.com… No offense taken on my part – and dammit, you’re gonna come to Nashville some time.
<<<<<<<<<BREATH OUT
I’ve been holding my breath since I wrote back to you. I’m so glad you weren’t angry. And Nashville is *so* high up on my list of priorities, you’d be amazed. It’s somewhere right below "get a job" and just above "pay the Sears bill".
lil (who’s gonna go check out airfare prices again, just for fun!) — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
You folks want me to leave a perfectly good friendship with a person who just happens to be my ex-husband because *you* think I need to. I disagree.
Lil this has nothing to do with leaveing a friendship. Are you this involved with any of your friends kids? Would you ever feel comfortable doing that? I’m not saying that you have to even move away but you dod need to step back and let DH and BM handle this for themselves. If you and Dh are truly just friends than your role in his son’s life is alot less than your role as his stepmom. There are certain things that no matter how hard the are for you to let go of are not yours to deal with any more, and what medication your friend puts his son on is one of them
If DH was a female roommate, would you all say that it was impossible for me to have a life while living here with her?
If she were your former lover I would. You and Dh aren’t just friends but friends that used to be married. the dynamic of the relationship is automatically going to change. You are not merely friends you are friends that shared a marriage. It’s not the same thing, and can’t compare.
What if she had a child that I helped her with?
I can almost guarentee that you would not have the same emotional attachment to that child that you would with SS.
Merrie once asked me why I would continue a relationship that wasn’t going anywhere? I remember it because it seemed like such a bizarre question to ask about a friendship. Are your friendships "going" somewhere? Are they all leading to marriage?
Because Lil many of us don’t view your relationship with Dh as a friendship. you still live with him, still refer to him as DH and not DF, still think of SS as your SS and not the son of your friend. Also I don’t think that you would ever be involved with a friend’s child the way you are with DH’s son.
All of your concern hinges on the fact that he’s my ex-husband and this doesn’t follow the traditional divorce pattern, so everybody wants to tell me that it’s wrong or unhealthy.
The fact that your friends with you ex is not wrong and unhealthy, the fact that you two might still be playing husband and wife in some cases might be unhealthy. Your continued involvement in SS’s life, might be unhealthy for your own psyche.
So if you’re all just holding your breath, waiting for the day that I cut off all ties with DH and stepson for no reason other than "so that I can get on with my life", I think you’d better find a new hobby.
No Lil. What you do with DH and SS really doesn’t matter much in the grand scheme of my life, but when you post you have to expect that we’ll have opinions about all of this.
But I have to do what’s right for me and, having explained that all before, I cannot keep going in this same circle. lil
well then do what you were already doing Lil. Love, Melissa "I’m a born again Q".
Response:
"Kim Scheinberg" <i…@panix.com
wrote in message
news:93d1go$ebr$1@panix6.panix.com…
Lil, I’ve written and rejected maybe a dozen responses to this. None of them were particularly kind, though they all came from genuine concern
<grin
I wouldn’t expect you to be particularly kind. And I know that anything you have to say comes from genuine concern, because you’re not the kind to waste your breath on people you don’t really give a rat’s ass about.
You have been here for years telling us you’re allergic to strawberries.
Almonds. I’m allergic to almonds. Several years back, when I was *finally* diagnosed with asthma, I was sent for allergy testing. Cat hair, feathers, dust, nearly every kind of tree or grass, raw corn, raw peas, raw beans and almonds. Most of this was alright with me. I hate cats. I *loath* birds. Dust gets in my way occasionally, as do the trees or grass, but I’m not dying to live like The Boy in the Plastic Bubble. Corn and peas can always be cooked and I’ve been looking for a reason to avoid beans since I was a small child. But I told the allergist that almonds were not an option–I wasn’t going to give them up. Since he’d now mentioned it, I did see that almonds caused my asthma to act up. Nothing life threatening, but an occasionally irritating problem. Still, I liked almonds and I wasn’t planning to give that up because he thought that I needed to. I would just have to learn to work around the problem. He could continue to tell me I have to stop eating the almonds while I continue to smile benignly and let it drift out the other ear, or he could accept that and we could talk about other solutions. So I still eat almonds because the problem they cause does not outweigh my liking them. And when I start to cough, I give myself a shot of FloVent and carry on.
Everything else is just rationalization and bullshit
Bullshit, I don’t know about. I believe everything I’m saying, but I’m not always the brightest crayon in the box. Rationalization, sure. Like I said to Martha, I have this bizarre notion that I owe more than a "no thanks" to you guys. I’ve always been like that–I answer questions with a story. At any rate, the rationalizations have a point. I’m not here because I’m hell bent on proving you guys wrong. Ask my mom…nothing anybody’s ever said has had any real influence on how I actually decide to live my life. I tell you that I won’t give up almonds for all the reasons you say I won’t give up strawberries and more. But the fact of the matter is simple–I like them. Likewise with DH. So far that still outweighs the things that bother me. lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
<filipi…@osu.edu
wrote in message
news:filipic.3-0801011124120001@164.107.35.122…
I think a lot of the feedback you’ve been getting has stemmed from things you’ve told us… here’s one item I believe you wrote…
Yes, I said that the idea of packing up and leaving was tempting. And I don’t know which thread that was (I keep no record of anything that I’m not thrilled about DH reading), but the Paxil thread was very clearly labled a vent. I have days where it would be easier to pack up and leave my life–I’m sure you do, too. That day they stemmed from stepson’s medication. Some days they stem from my bills. My bills are *far* more difficult to overcome than my problems with stepson. I could declare bankruptcy tomorrow–I have no assets to lose and I’d never have to worry about these bills again. That’s the easy way out. It’s harder to make a commitment to take responsibility for something that you took on with your eyes open. So do I still fantasize about bankruptcy? You bet. Would I like myself much if I did it? Nope.
I think people here understand those kinds of difficulties more than they understand the positives you experience in the relationship you have with your ex.
Exactly. And as I said, I truly love you all for the concern that you have for me. I’m just tired of feeling that I have to explain why somebody else’s solution isn’t right for me. Certainly not right now. Maybe not ever. To be totally honest, with a little more fine tuning this kind of a living arrangement really agrees with me. Anne was very close to the mark when she called it a marriage without sex. But it’s also a marriage without guilt or encumbrances. I’m free to do what I like–travel where I like, hang out where I like, date who I like. So is DH. And when we come home, there’s somebody here to talk to. This works for me.
Don’t worry so much about explaining every last detail to all of us. Take what is helpful, and let the rest slide away to internet-oblivion.
Sigh. Therein lies the problem, though. Sometimes it’s hard to see the concern and I just feel like you all are waiting to see who wins the break-up pool. And private e-mails are so much more difficult to ignore than posts, because they’re right there in your face from people that you love and who you know care about what happens to you. And "thanks, but no," doesn’t seem to cut it as a response–especially when people have trusted you with their own painful history as an example. lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
"lilblakdog" <lbdcreati…@dog.com
writes You folks want me to leave a perfectly good friendship with a person who just happens to be my ex-husband because *you* think I need to. I disagree.
Lil, I’ve written and rejected maybe a dozen responses to this. None of them were particularly kind, though they all came from genuine concern You have been here for years telling us you’re allergic to strawberries. You give us the details of every rash that occurs after eating them (most especially, I’ll note, on Halloween and Xmas). You relay agonizing details about the short-term effects these strawberries have, and occasionally wonder if they might not have long-term effects, too When we tell you in all manner of ways to STOP EATING THE STRAWBERRIES you remind us how good they taste, how much you enjoy them, how you’ve devoted years to collecting and perfecting various strawberry recipes. You’re invested in strawberries. You have strawberry bushes in your yard. You have a wholesale strawberry business you can’t afford to give up You’ve stopped eating them, you say. Now you’ve reduced your life to growing them and picking them and cooking with them and just enjoying the scent. They benefit your life somehow Guess what? You’re still having allergic reactions. Maybe you don’t wash your hands well enough after handling them. Maybe it’s absorbed through your skin. I don’t know BUT THE STRAWBERRIES ARE SLOWLY KILLING YOU Everything else is just rationalization and bullshit Find a new business, Lil. Grow a different garden. Get out. How many people need to observe this? How many of us can be so wrongity-wrong? -k.
Response:
Hi lil, I understand the frustration you’re feeling right now. But I think a lot of the feedback you’ve been getting has stemmed from things you’ve told us… here’s one item I believe you wrote:
I know. But the only way to do it would be to actually pack up and leave, cutting them off completely. And that idea is *soooo* tempting right now, to be totally honest with you. I can’t think about this stuff, because it’s killing me. The idea of feeding *my* child unnecessary drugs makes me sick.
It almost sounds as if you wanted to hear that it would be OK if you decided to just remove yourself totally from the situation. And I think people here responded to that. But of course it’s OK to stick with it, too, if that’s what you want to do. In fact, as long as you have the strength and energy and desire to continue it, it sounds like the input you’ll have on SS’s life will be an incredibly positive influence. It could become difficult at times, because as a step, you’re at the mercy of the bioparents’ wishes. And I think people here understand those kinds of difficulties more than they understand the positives you experience in the relationship you have with your ex. Don’t worry so much about explaining every last detail to all of us. Take what is helpful, and let the rest slide away to internet-oblivion. All the best, Martha In article <2L566.2705$O8.32…@newscontent-01.sprint.ca
, "lilblakdog"
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -<lbdcreati…@dog.com
wrote: Sigh. You’re missing something rather significant, though. TC left because she was in a bad relationship with an abusive alchoholic. She needed to leave that relationship for her own health, safety and state of mind, if nothing else, and it was impossible to do so and still salvage the relationship with her–for all intents and purposes–stepdaughter. I’ve heard this type of advice from many of you–three this week, that I remember; I think nearly *all* of you at one point or another. And I *know* that your advice comes from your concern for me, and I love you for that concern. But one of these days I’m going to be what appears to be one of those spontaneous combustion cases–they’re going to walk in and find char and ashes all around my computer chair and nothing else damaged. So please let me re-iterate and get out everything that I need to say, one last time. And then I have to stop discussing this with you all, because it exhausts me to have to explain myself over and over and I just cannot do it anymore. You folks want me to leave a perfectly good friendship with a person who just happens to be my ex-husband because *you* think I need to. I disagree. If DH was a female roommate, would you all say that it was impossible for me to have a life while living here with her? What if she had a child that I helped her with? My friend’s best friend is a single mother and so my friend spends a lot of time and effort helping her raise her son. Should she walk away too? Because she has no ties to this child and needs to get on with her *own* life? Merrie once asked me why I would continue a relationship that wasn’t going anywhere? I remember it because it seemed like such a bizarre question to ask about a friendship. Are your friendships "going" somewhere? Are they all leading to marriage? Because if they are, I think you’re right…I need to get new friends. All of your concern hinges on the fact that he’s my ex-husband and this doesn’t follow the traditional divorce pattern, so everybody wants to tell me that it’s wrong or unhealthy. I never got my copy of The Big Book of Divorce, but I’ll tell you something…I consider mine pretty successful. I have everything that I set out to have at the time that I left DH–things I never thought I would have again. And I don’t feel that I’m losing *anything* in the process. So if you’re all just holding your breath, waiting for the day that I cut off all ties with DH and stepson for no reason other than "so that I can get on with my life", I think you’d better find a new hobby. I *have* gotten on with my life and, thankfully, have managed to keep one of my best friends and a relationship with the child that I love. You folks need to understand and appreciate that I’m not going anywhere anytime soon…and when I do, I won’t be going far. I’ll still be best friends with DH, and will still be special friends with my stepson. Until such time that something unavoidable happens–like a new woman in DH’s life–this is the way that things will continue. Because *I* want it to. And, currently, so do DH and stepson. It’s unorthodox, and I completely appreciate your not understanding it. But socially, right now, I feel 100% fulfilled, just the way things are, and I have no desire to change it. Get me a job and shave five years off my age, and I’d be very, very happy with my life right now. I know an awful lot of parasites–people who’s only concern for me is my ability to do things for them. I just had this discussion earlier this year with Merrie, when I was trying to end a friendship with a person I no longer valued as a friend. I’m currently dealing with two others–one being Roomie–and I’m just keeping my head above water with them, trying to see if there’s anything left to salvage. The idea of leaving a wonderful, fulfilling friendship for absolutely no reason is ludicrous. When I left DH, I told my brother that my mom was worried about what the family would say. He turned to me and said, "Leslie, anybody who was at that wedding would *not* be surprised that it turned out like this." And it’s true–I never heard a word from anybody at my wedding. My distant family, however, all think that I *need* to go back to him. My distant friends think I *need* to cut off all ties with him completely. The people who really know me and have actually met DH and I are all happy that things have turned out so well and that everyone is happy with the current situation. What do you think that says? I’m not one of those people who think that support means agreeing with everything I say and do. You’ve given me your advice and I’ve read it, understood where it was coming from, and appreciated it. But I have to do what’s right for me and, having explained that all before, I cannot keep going in this same circle. lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
Okay, so the medication is really just the tip of a rather jagged iceberg. I’m noticing some things in the past year that really have me concerned. And yeah, I know…it’s none of my business. But they’ve still got me concerned. They seem to have begun around the time Nikki came to visit. Why that would trigger a problem, I’m not sure…although biomom was *livid* that Nikki, DH and I stayed in the hotel that DH and biomom used to have their torrid weekends in. And insisted that we didn’t introduce Nikki to her (even though she didn’t even bother to come out of the back of the house when we arrived), so that she felt like a second-class citizen in her own home). *And* stepson was full of "Nikki did this" and "Nikki did that" when he got home. Anyhow, it seemed to have brought out all her anger at DH leaving her and marrying me (*years* in between, but nonetheless…). Less than a week later, she decided to pull DH’s spring visitation at the last minute. We didn’t see him again for over a month. I don’t know what was said when DH had stepson phone her during our camping trip, but he was in tears for hours afterward…then she tried to cut our vacation short. And yes, there were extenuating circumstances, but she was still *really* put out that DH wouldn’t rush him home immediately upon her request. And I think she was even more angry that it was stepson himself who decided that he’d prefer to camp…I don’t think she ever expected that he’d one day choose us over her. She refused to let us have him for Halloween. For *some* reason (DH says it was his idea, but it doesn’t fit his profile and *does* fit hers), we didn’t see stepson on Christmas. And our "half of vacation" was whittled down to the three days of New Year’s weekend. She called on the second day, during dinner, and wanted to talk to stepson. He told her he was eating but she still had him on the phone for nearly twenty minutes–wanting to know what he got for Christmas, what he was doing, where he slept, WHERE DH AND I SLEPT (at which point I very nearly took the phone away from him and hung it up, and *will* the next time), etc. Then she told DH she wanted him to call her back at midnight. She saw him the day before and was seeing him again the next day…I don’t get the point. This was supposed to be DH’s weekend (one of only *four* in the past year), and yet it seemed to revolve around her. I know she’s been furious that DH won’t rush to her side anymore, whenever she screams crisis. I’m sure she thought that DH would want to attend her father’s funeral, and asking him to come home would just seem obvious. The medication just seems to be one more attention grabber–like the eurology testing and the zillions of trips to the emergency room. But I feel like we’re poisoning him against our will (and yes, it is "us", because DH doesn’t remember to give him the medication). And she behaves as though she’s put one over on us. She hands DH the medication with a smug look on her face and practically *dares* him to challenge her. And the fact that DH *doesn’t* makes my blood run even colder. How can a man who cares so much do so little??? I’ve cried over this. I’ve lost sleep. I’ve thrown up. I feel like throwing up just writing about it. Sometimes I wonder why she doesn’t just put a bullet to his head, so that she and DH can "share" in their grief. I honestly don’t know what kind of a life he’ll have otherwise. She resents his making his own decisions if it doesn’t work in her favor. Any time DH doesn’t do exactly as she wants, she does something more to stepson. This time it’s anti-depressants. Next time will it be a labotomy, like Frances Farmer? I don’t know where it all ends. And stepson’s nothing more to her than a voodoo doll she can hug one minute and stick a pin into the next. But what do I do? Walk away? It would help me, but what will it do to stepson? How can I punish him for something his mother is doing? He needs all the sane, rational support he can get, but it’s really, really killing me to watch this unfold. I feel like picking him up and running as far and fast as possible–away from both of his screwy parents! lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
I don’t know how Lindsay would interpret your past actions, but I suspect it would be beneficial for her to know that in regards to her parents – it’s them not her – that are screwed up. It sometimes seems so obvious – but often not to the kid. Merrie – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
I dream sometimes of trying to track down Lindsay when she is older. To try to explain to her why I had to leave. Some day when she is old enough to understand it. I still question whether this would be beneficial or detrimental to her. Maybe some day she will find me again.
Response:
In article <3a54d380.505886…@enews.newsguy.com
, posted Thu, 04 Jan
2001 02:49:44 GMT, T.C. says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 15:30:59 -0800, "lilblakdog" <lbdcreati…@dog.com wrote: But what do I do? Walk away? It would help me, but what will it do to stepson? How can I punish him for something his mother is doing? He needs all the sane, rational support he can get, but it’s really, really killing me to watch this unfold. I feel like picking him up and running as far and fast as possible–away from both of his screwy parents! Ok Lil,this may make me really unpopular but here goes… At some point you will just have to walk away. I lived with a man who was an alcoholic and had two daughters. Their mother was a bona-fide wacko – she’d already been remarried twice when I came on the scene (the girls were 3 and 5). I was the sanest person in their lives and the oldest child, Lindsay and I developed a very close, very special bond. Lindsay’s mother was intimidated by the child’s intelligence and either degraded her or ignored her – I encouraged her to grow and develop her intelligence. I tried to instill self confidence in her, tried to nurture her, tried to help her as best I could. She was 8 the day I walked out the door. I *had* to go. I could no longer live with a man that was co-dependent, emotionally abusive, and becoming physically abusive. I could no longer support him financially while at the same time post-poning my own education and growth. *I* had to go. I had to go for *me*. I will never forget Lindsay standing on the front porch screaming for me not to leave. I still cry when I think about it. A few years later I met DH – I’d sworn I would never get involved with another man with kids. But he got to me. I had to have him and I’ve never regretted marrying him. But I wouldn’t have him, I wouldn’t have grown into the person I am, I wouldn’t have *finally* found happiness if I had stayed in a bad relationship for a child that wasn’t mine. It crossed my mind several times over the years to try to contact Lindsay. She found me once when I moved to Nashville and we talked for a short time on the phone. But it was better that I stayed silent for the most part. I could only cause her more pain as I couldn’t be there for her on a regular basis. I couldn’t help her. I saw her father last year and he told me that she was in a treatment center. She was having emotional problems. He lost custody after I left – he couldn’t hold it together without me, or he chose not to. It was easier to blame me for leaving. Her mother continued with her wacky behavior and she eventually lost *both* girls, the younger is living with her paternal grandmother (a good woman, I might add, despite the fact that she *hates* me). It hurt me to hear about what happened to them, but I had done everything I could. It boiled down to the fact that I was not a parent, I had no say in their lives. And, no matter how much I wanted to, I could not take them with me. I could not sacrifice my future and the future of my as-yet-to-be-born children. I dream sometimes of trying to track down Lindsay when she is older. To try to explain to her why I had to leave. Some day when she is old enough to understand it. I still question whether this would be beneficial or detrimental to her. Maybe some day she will find me again. Lil, you can’t change either of his parents – they have to change themselves. It sounds like neither one of them is ready to do that. You, on the other hand, are making changes in your life. You are trying to move forward and grow. I think you should move on. It’ll hurt, terribly. And there will always be some regret – but you need to do it. If I were I your shoes, I would find another apartment and move out. Even if it’s a hovel – you need your own space and a break from this situation. DH needs to stand on his own two feet, and he won’t do that as long as you continue to give him a place to ‘lean’. He needs to learn to take care of SS himself. BM shows no signs of changing, but she doesn’t have to as long as she’s got you to back her up as well. Cut them both loose. Make your own future – don’t let them dictate what it will be.
Thanks for that story TC – what a tough decision, but it’s obvious that you had to do it. Providing a frame so that two other adults can ignore the mess they’ve made is not much of a life – and not really fair to anybody. Kevin — Quotes of a five year old girl "Life. It can be scary sometimes, you know, like when there’s a fire or it’s dark or blah blah blah."
Response:
In article <Llr46.9191$EX5.95…@newscontent-01.sprint.ca
, posted Tue, 2
Jan 2001 13:04:49 -0800, lilblakdog says…
"Melissa " <laa…@aol.comspamfree wrote in message news:20010102121023.00467.00000871@ng-fj1.aol.com… Yes Lil, you are stressing yourself to the breaking point over a situation you can do nothing about. You and DH are divorced, he won’t step up to the plate, BM will take advantage of it. It’s going to happen. There is nothing you can do. I know. But the only way to do it would be to actually pack up and leave, cutting them off completely. And that idea is *soooo* tempting right now, to be totally honest with you. I can’t think about this stuff, because it’s killing me. The idea of feeding *my* child unnecessary drugs makes me sick.
There’s something in here that keeps niggling at me. Something to do with relationship balances. It seems to me, Lil, that you fulfill a very specific role in the life of stepson, taking up responsibilities which normally would come from the parents. Is it possible, that should you withdraw from the situation, - besides being probably healthier for you – that it would actually trigger off some latent similar parenting integrity in Biomom and DH which are at the moment your ‘property’? I have seen this happen, and it doesn’t happen quick. However right now, you could be in a way enabling them both to be complacent. There’s no need for them to change because . . you’re there doing the hard work which covers up their mistakes…. It’s a tough decision, because you would never know until after the fact whether it was right or not. Kevin — Quotes of a five year old girl "If I look for a long time at myself in the mirror I start to look grown up. It’s starting to happen now. I’m growing, like beans. So mirrors are very special."
Response:
"Kevin" <sevenths…@hotmail.com
wrote in message
news:MPG.14bc8b876f5e84259896b6@news.ntlworld.com…
Is it possible, that should you withdraw from the situation, - besides being probably healthier for you – that it would actually trigger off some latent similar parenting integrity in Biomom and DH which are at the moment your ‘property’?
Uh-uh. Biomom lives in total denial of what I do, and goes to great lengths to destroy any progress I make, immediately after I make it. The only thing that my disappearing will do for her is that she’ll be able to continue as she wishes without anybody lobbying for stepson and what is actually best for him. Biomom would be perfectly happy to have stepson live with her forever, totally dependent on her. She has often seemed to me (her father’s death being an excellent for-instance) incapable of dealing with certain things without stepson being with her. As for DH, I can very nearly guarantee you that he will allow stepson to slip out of his life completely. He had neglected all of his friendships to near death until I came on the scene and revived them. I got them all into varrying degrees of health before giving up completely (due to a total lack of support on his part), and DH hasn’t seen any of them since we were married. It was and is very much the same thing with his family relationships. Without me–or someone else to fulfill my role–DH will be unable to have any real degree of visitation. He works in retail management, and weekends off are few and far between, as are holiday weekends. Any visitation he has will more than likely be spent in near silence, in front of the television, and they will slip further and further apart. Biomom will, in turn, use this to keep stepson at home more and more, until DH becomes the typical biological father who shows up at graduation, weddings and the occasional birthday/holiday. Now, none of this is my business and I don’t lose any sleep over it. I can’t be there to hold everybody upright. What *is* my business is that I took on a certain role when I married DH–a role that was a lot more involved than most NC stepparents. I take that role and the current reprecussions from it very seriously. Stepson looks to me for nearly everything when he’s with us; my removing myself from his life and leaving him to whatever fate is waiting for him is not going to happen, unless I’m forced too. *I* built this relationship, with all of my heart and my good intentions. I haven’t committed to a hell of a lot in my life, but I’m committed to this. I cannot simply walk away because it’s suddenly too difficult, or I want to see what biomom or DH will do when I’m gone. After nearly eight years of studying both of them, I *know* what they’ll do when I’m gone. The only thing worse than what stepson is going through now, and what more than likely continues to wait for him in his future, is for him to have to go through it without *any* outside support and wondering where in hell I went??? If biomom or DH want to instigate that and live with the fallout, that’s their choice. But I’m not going to. FWIW, though, I don’t "parent" in the same way I used to. I force DH to plan their day, plan their meals, and cover all expenses incurred. I offer my opinion as a concerned friend of both DH and stepson (often rather passionately), but I don’t beat a dead horse. I do only as much disciplining as is normal for an adult figure living in this house. If stepson gets too noisy, I ask him to settle down. If he’s touching something that I don’t wish touched, I let him know. If he’s making too big a mess, I ask him to begin cleaning up. But any of the heavy duty parenting is done by DH or isn’t done at all. I have happily relinquished myself of most of that role, and enjoy being "just a friend". lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
"C&HWood" <line…@in.epix.net
wrote in message
news:3a5253f4.30495413@news.epix.net…
A while ago on the list, someone talked about a "Circle of Control" where they literally drew a circle, and put everything they can control inside the circle, and everything they can’t outside. Do you remember that – I’m a little fuzzy on the details.
<grin
I’m a dismal failure at "Circle of Control." I’m of the opinion that *everything’s* in my control. I’m not good with the idea that I can’t do anything that I put enough effort into. :-) For instance:
Decide appropriate medication
I have stepson’s medical insurance number. I still have identification that says that I am Mrs. DH…not that the doctor has ever asked for it. I can take stepson to the doctor he sees here and say, "This is what he’s being given. This is his history." I could even bring in half a dozen witnesses, which is something biomom can’t. And at the very *least*, I can get the medication changed. I can get a letter from the doctor to biomom. If I did that, DH would take it to biomom and say, "This is the new situation, based on the truth about <stepson
’s condition. This time *you* don’t fight
*me*." DH will do it…if I do the legwork, as always.
BD’s attitude & activity with son & ex
I can badger the hell out of DH until he does something to deal with the ex. It’s worked before. As for his activity with his son, that’s *always* been in my control. DH won’t even plan lunch for the two of them without my input and/or approval.
Whether you work with SS in school
This one I’ve let go of anyway. I told DH that I would help stepson if I had his and biomom’s total support and assistance. I haven’t got it. I won’t help. I’m done with the annual blood, sweat and tears, trying to teach him the things that he should have learned in school, only to have him forget them again after he goes home.
If not, at least know that there’s a perfect stranger who’s sending you good vibes and wishing you well with your difficulties.
<smile
Thanks, Holly! lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
Hi Lil, I normally just lurk here (for years, posting once in a while) but I wanted to reply to your situation here: "lilblakdog" <lbdcreati…@dog.com
wrote: "Melissa " <laa…@aol.comspamfree wrote in message news:20010102121023.00467.00000871@ng-fj1.aol.com… Yes Lil, you are stressing yourself to the breaking point over a situation you can do nothing about. You and DH are divorced, he won’t step up to the plate, BM will take advantage of it. It’s going to happen. There is nothing you can do. I know. But the only way to do it would be to actually pack up and leave, cutting them off completely.
I know you’re stressed, and it might seem like it has to be all or nothing, but it’s not. A while ago on the list, someone talked about a "Circle of Control" where they literally drew a circle, and put everything they can control inside the circle, and everything they can’t outside. Do you remember that – I’m a little fuzzy on the details. It seems to me there is a lot that you can do (and are doing) for this little boy you love so much, but because of your situation, there’s a lot you can’t do, too. And you’re stressing a lot over the stuff that you can’t actually change. For instance, regarding the paxil and other recent issues, you could put things like Decide appropriate medication BD’s attitude & activity with son & ex Whether you work with SS in school all outside your circle of control. Because they aren’t something you can control, no matter how much you want to, and stressing about them is *only* going to stress you, not change anything. But you can put all kinds of things *inside* your circle, because you can do them. Things like talking to SS when you see him, researching about whatever condition he is supposedly being medcated for, helping him learn techniques for dealing with it (if he has it – doubtful, I know) or ways to deal with his wacko mother (not that you’d ever call her that in front of him
, help him with school & learning when you do see him, work on bettering and continuing *your* relationship with SS so he knows you care, and so forth. And those are all good, worthwhile things, and thinking about the positive things you can do has *got* to be better than thinking about the stuff you want to change, but can’t. I don’t know if this making sense, I have my own set of "things outside my circle of control" and one of them is having my brain work somedays. I hope you understand I offer this advice with the best of intentions and hopes that it can help you at least a little. If not, at least know that there’s a perfect stranger who’s sending you good vibes and wishing you well with your difficulties. Holly
Response:
But what do I do? Walk away?
Yes Lil, you are stressing yourself to the breaking point over a situation you can do nothing about. You and DH are divorced, he won’t step up to the plate, BM will take advantage of it. It’s going to happen. There is nothing you can do. Maybe you should take an SS vacation fo awhile. Don’t discuss it with DH, don’t even think about it. Take some time to regroup. Love, Melissa "I’m a born again Q".
Response:
"lilblakdog" <lbdcreati…@dog.com
wrote in message
news:To846.8824$EX5.85869@newscontent-01.sprint.ca…
But what do I do? Walk away? It would help me, but what will it do to stepson? How can I punish him for something his mother is doing?
Oh, {{{{{{HUGS}}}}}, Lil! I understand how you feel. It’s like being 500 feet away from an accident that is occurring and you can see it all unfolding in slow motion before your eyes. You think that if the drivers’ of each car could just hear your instructions they could minimize the damage. You realize they can’t hear you so you wonder about how you could run in and ’save’ the situation. But you can’t. It’s happening anyway and has already been happening. Remember, though, that *YOU* did NOT cause the accident. *THEY* did. You can only do so much and then it’s out of your hands. You’re still going to see the accident happening and you’re only human to feel ill and uneasy with being a witness to it all. But, like a ‘real’ accident, emergency personnel must assess the situation and see how ’safe’ it is. If it is unsafe for *them* they MUST make it so or they will die in the process of ‘rescue’. Failing to ’save’ anyone else and throwing their own life away at the same time. You need to make the situation ’safe’ for *you* first. There is a strong impulse in you to help, but you need to come at it with making sure *you* are in a safe place first. Otherwise, you just become another piece in the ‘accident’. OK, I’m sorry if that advice seems as clear as mud. I just hate seeing you internalize something that is NOT your fault and not something that you can ‘fix’. You can only work with *you* in the equation because that is the only thing you truly have absolute control over. I’m also feeling bad that the New Year has started off on such a bad note for you. Tea
Response:
"Melissa " <laa…@aol.comspamfree
wrote in message
news:20010102121023.00467.00000871@ng-fj1.aol.com…
Yes Lil, you are stressing yourself to the breaking point over a situation
you
can do nothing about. You and DH are divorced, he won’t step up to the
plate,
BM will take advantage of it. It’s going to happen. There is nothing you
can
do.
I know. But the only way to do it would be to actually pack up and leave, cutting them off completely. And that idea is *soooo* tempting right now, to be totally honest with you. I can’t think about this stuff, because it’s killing me. The idea of feeding *my* child unnecessary drugs makes me sick. But that’s the problem. For nearly eight years now, he’s been *my* child–with everybody’s blessing. I was ravingly unsuccessful at bearing any of my own and that’s made him more than just my step-child. I know that some day DH or biomom could decide that enough’s enough and I don’t get to see him anymore and I’m prepared for that day. But it’s totally different to just get up and walk away from it voluntarily. When I think of doing it, it’s easier to imagine that I’d be able to amputate my own limb. And that’s *really* a dangerous thing…I don’t need anybody to tell me that. But this seems to be the hazaard of marrying someone with a child that you love–you can’t make yourself stop loving the child, just because you’re no longer married to the parent. lil — "It’s hard when you discover what keeps you going keeps you all alone." – Blue Rodeo
Response:
It’s too bad we can’t force medicate your BM.
She hands DH the medication with a smug look on her face and practically *dares* him to challenge her.
"This time: gonna do it RIGHT!" — Bob Seger Jennaii
Response:
Author:
admin on
Category:
Of Flovent And
Tags: 1
Related Posts
Prescription Medication Knowledge Base » When Will Flovent Have Generic Form » Barbra hirsch… Can u help?
Barbra hirsch… Can u help?
Question:
So why is it there is such a shortage? Is it for all types of phentermine? I was told that the company stopped making the 30 mg dosage so people were getting 15mg and taking 2. But that the 37.5 was not a problem to get. Is this wrong? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was reading a transcript of one of your chats on WebMD and I followed a link you had posted there to an Rx site http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/phenterm.htm. . I see that they have Phentermine hcl there. The cost is $20 for a 90 day supply. I was wondering if this was pure phentermine? I bought some phentermine pills a while back from another site and paid about $300 for a 90 day supply. I am wondering if you can tell me what the differences are in the different mixes of phentermine. I used to be on Phen-fen and have just never found anything quite like it since. I have pretty good results (2pnds per week) with the phentermine, but now I am not sure what kind to buy and where to buy it at a fair price. I would really appreciate any feedback or help you could give. As far as I know RxList is a monograph service, and it does not sell drugs. $20 for a 90 day supply sounds kind of low, maybe for a 30 day supply. But I don’t have any information about which pharmacies are reliable, or where the best places are to buy it. I do have a few "virtual pharmacies" listed on the OMR site, but they are regular pharmacies (like the cyberpharmacy) and they require a prescription from your doctor. With the shortage I don’t know what pharmacies still have generic phentermine, and I have no real advice to offer you other than that given in the April 2000 issue of OMR on the phentermine shortage. If you are interested in information on the various types of phentermine, there is an autoresponder on the Obesity Meds and Research News site. Just go to the FAQ page and click on the phentermine primer. That will send you an e-mail with the basics about all the major types of phentermine. You might also want to stop by current obesity medications FAQ and read the section there on phentermine. Been out of town for the last week, and off-line for the last several days. Hope this helps. Barbara Barbara Hirsch, Publisher OBESITY MEDS AND RESEARCH NEWS May issue: Ephedrine and thermogenesis. http://www.obesity-news.com/
Response:
As far as I know RxList is a monograph service, and it does not sell drugs. $20 for a 90 day supply sounds kind of low, maybe for a 30 day supply.
That doesn’t sound low at all for the wholesale price. A 60 day supply goes for $17.76 at drugstore.com.
Response:
I was reading a transcript of one of your chats on WebMD and I followed a link you had posted there to an Rx site http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/phenterm.htm. . I see that they have Phentermine hcl there. The cost is $20 for a 90 day supply. I was wondering if this was pure phentermine? I bought some phentermine pills a while back from another site and paid about $300 for a 90 day supply. I am wondering if you can tell me what the differences are in the different mixes of phentermine. I used to be on Phen-fen and have just never found anything quite like it since. I have pretty good results (2pnds per week) with the phentermine, but now I am not sure what kind to buy and where to buy it at a fair price. I would really appreciate any feedback or help you could give.
As far as I know RxList is a monograph service, and it does not sell drugs. $20 for a 90 day supply sounds kind of low, maybe for a 30 day supply. But I don’t have any information about which pharmacies are reliable, or where the best places are to buy it. I do have a few "virtual pharmacies" listed on the OMR site, but they are regular pharmacies (like the cyberpharmacy) and they require a prescription from your doctor. With the shortage I don’t know what pharmacies still have generic phentermine, and I have no real advice to offer you other than that given in the April 2000 issue of OMR on the phentermine shortage. If you are interested in information on the various types of phentermine, there is an autoresponder on the Obesity Meds and Research News site. Just go to the FAQ page and click on the phentermine primer. That will send you an e-mail with the basics about all the major types of phentermine. You might also want to stop by current obesity medications FAQ and read the section there on phentermine. Been out of town for the last week, and off-line for the last several days. Hope this helps. Barbara Barbara Hirsch, Publisher OBESITY MEDS AND RESEARCH NEWS May issue: Ephedrine and thermogenesis. http://www.obesity-news.com/
Response:
I was reading a transcript of one of your chats on WebMD and I followed a link you had posted there to an Rx site http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/phenterm.htm. . I see that they have Phentermine hcl there. The cost is $20 for a 90 day supply. I was wondering if this was pure phentermine? I bought some phentermine pills a while back from another site and paid about $300 for a 90 day supply. I am wondering if you can tell me what the differences are in the different mixes of phentermine. I used to be on Phen-fen and have just never found anything quite like it since. I have pretty good results (2pnds per week) with the phentermine, but now I am not sure what kind to buy and where to buy it at a fair price. I would really appreciate any feedback or help you could give. Needing to lose 30 pounds……. happygirl
Response:
Related Posts
Prescription Medication Knowledge Base » Wheezing Cough And Flovent » asthma and dairy products
asthma and dairy products
Question:
I quit all daiary products may 1 1997 and my asthma is almost gone. What does anybody know anything aabout dairy foods and asthma? Harlan Lee
If your asthma stays in remission, it would indicate that you were/are allergic to milk. I don’t know of any other connection that milk could have with asthma other than allergic reaction. Yana
Response:
<<I quit all daiary products may 1 1997 and my asthma is almost gone. What does anybody know anything aabout dairy foods and asthma? Harlan Lee
i went to an accupuncturist/holistic medicine specialist for my allergies and asthma. he strongly believes that the high amount of antibiotics given to cows is a bad thing for our immune system and suggested i stop dairy. i have done this, but also stayed on serevent and flovent. connection? don’t know. i do note that the one or two times i strayed and recently had dairy, that i felt some tightness. good health to all…
Response:
I quit all daiary products may 1 1997 and my asthma is almost gone. What does anybody know anything aabout dairy foods and asthma? Harlan Lee
Response:
I quit all daiary products may 1 1997 and my asthma is almost gone. What does anybody know anything aabout dairy foods and asthma? Harlan Lee
This could be a coincidence; I’m not aware of a relationship between asthma and dairy products. Also a 4-month remission is not proof that your asthma is cured. A 12-month remission would be more convincing. There is an article indicating some outgrow their asthma. See http://www.ama-assn.org/special/asthma/library/scan/outgrow.htm American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol. 155, pp. 1267-1272, Apr. 1997 Adult Patients May Outgrow Their Asthma: A 25-Year Follow-up Study
Response:
Author:
admin on
Category:
Wheezing Cough And Flovent
Tags: 1
Related Posts
Prescription Medication Knowledge Base » Zoloft Dose » Zoloft Problem
Zoloft Problem
Question:
Hi, I have been on zoloft for about a year now. It has absolutely erased my anxiety. I am on 25 mgs a day, which I know is low, but it seems to work for me. I have not slept well in months now, which I know is a side effect. At the same time, I am scared to try and come off this. The zoloft has zapped my depression and anxiety, yet who can go without good sleep? I know I have to call my doc, but I wanted to start with you guys first. chaz — The charter is available at:
Author:
admin on
Category:
Zoloft Dose
Tags: Zoloft Dose
Related Posts
Prescription Medication Knowledge Base » Effexor Dose » Effexor increase update…
Effexor increase update…
Question:
Been on 75 mgs of Effexor for two days now and am feeling just fine. No nausea this time, just a bit wired. I was given a 7 37.5 mgs to alternate for the first two weeks, one day 75 the next day 37.5, but after day one I felt fine on the 75 mgs so I decided just to take the full dose everyday. I took a Xanax the other day, had a pap test, which causes me so much anxiety I could puke. I felt awful, real, real tired. I like the Klonopin better even though it takes longer to take effect. I guess that’s the way it is, medication works differently for everyone. I am feeling better anxiety wise too, I’ve been taking Effexor ER for a month now. Am going grocery shopping today and only feel mildy anxious about it. Which is a big step for me because grocery shopping and the big stores are a huge cause of my anxiety. Hope to be around here more, I am off to check out the German newsreader. Hugs, Annette
Response:
So glad your med increase if working out well, Annette. May your grocery shopping be uneventful. Take care, Liz – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Been on 75 mgs of Effexor for two days now and am feeling just fine. No nausea this time, just a bit wired. I was given a 7 37.5 mgs to alternate for the first two weeks, one day 75 the next day 37.5, but after day one I felt fine on the 75 mgs so I decided just to take the full dose everyday. I took a Xanax the other day, had a pap test, which causes me so much anxiety I could puke. I felt awful, real, real tired. I like the Klonopin better even though it takes longer to take effect. I guess that’s the way it is, medication works differently for everyone. I am feeling better anxiety wise too, I’ve been taking Effexor ER for a month now. Am going grocery shopping today and only feel mildy anxious about it. Which is a big step for me because grocery shopping and the big stores are a huge cause of my anxiety. Hope to be around here more, I am off to check out the German newsreader. Hugs, Annette
Response:
:Been on 75 mgs of Effexor for two days now and am feeling just fine. :No nausea this time, just a bit wired. I was given a 7 37.5 mgs to :alternate for the first two weeks, one day 75 the next day 37.5, but :after day one I felt fine on the 75 mgs so I decided just to take the :full dose everyday. Dear Annette, Glad to hear that you are doing well on your increased effexor dose
Jackie ~*~I answer the heroic question "Death, where is they sting?" with "It is here in my heart and mind and memories~*~ ~Maya Angelou~
Response:
Author:
admin on
Category:
Effexor Dose
Tags: Effexor Dose
Related Posts
Prescription Medication Knowledge Base » Prozac Effexor » New meds
New meds
Question:
Ok, so my doctor agreed to try another SSRI, but she wanted me to wean off Paxil first! Told her I could wean off one and wean onto another at the same time, but she was dubious about that so I asked her to look it up and ask around… now she agrees. She has prescribed Effexor.
Although Effexor technically is not an SSRI it is cross tolerant with SSRI’s so switching this way should be no problem. I’ve been told to take 20 mgs of paxil(instead of 40) and to add 37,5mgs of effexor for the next 3 days, then drop the paxil completely and raise the effexor to 75mgs. Does this sound about right? It seems like a fast changeover to me, but I’d rather deal with any side effects and get this change over with quickly myself anyway.
I agree that this may be a tad fast but I think it can be done if you are prepared to white-knuckle through some possible temporary side effects. My other question; is the target does of 75 mgs of effexor comparible to the 40 mgs of paxil I’ve been taking?
That is impossible to say as our reactions to meds are so personal. 75 mg of Effexor sound OK to me and if after a few weeks you feel it doesn’t work well enough you can always raise the dose a bit more. My xanax has been switched from 2x .5mg per day to 1x 1mg xanax XR per day. Hopefully it will stop me feeling like a yo-yo, I may need to ask for a dose increase I think.
I think so too considering the AD change. I take Xanax XR and IMO it is far preferable to *normal* Xanax. No rollercoatser effect anymore but a comparatively very smooth ride. Any thoughts/comments about this change in meds?
No
) Keep us posted! Philip – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –
Response:
Ok, so my doctor agreed to try another SSRI, but she wanted me to wean off Paxil first! Told her I could wean off one and wean onto another at the same time, but she was dubious about that so I asked her to look it up and ask around… now she agrees. She has prescribed Effexor. I’ve been told to take 20mgs of paxil(instead of 40) and to add 37,5mgs of effexor for the next 3 days, then drop the paxil completely and raise the effexor to 75mgs. Does this sound about right? It seems like a fast changeover to me, but I’d rather deal with any side effects and get this change over with quickly myself anyway. My other question; is the target does of 75 mgs of effexor comparible to the 40 mgs of paxil I’ve been taking? My xanax has been switched from 2x .5mg per day to 1x 1mg xanax XR per day. Hopefully it will stop me feeling like a yo-yo, I may need to ask for a dose increase I think. I’ll soon find out, considering the other med change! : ) Any thoughts/comments about this change in meds? I mean to start the changeover tommorow… Vashti
Response:
From what you say above, and below, Vashti, it doesn’t seem like she has a good grip on these medications, but at least is open minded. Both frustrating and refreshing at the same time!
well could be dangerous to be less savy about things one prescribes Yes, I think it’s far too fast and large a drop in Paxil,
I concur My biggest concern would be that sudden drop of Paxil from 40 to 20, with a "starter" dose of Effexor ( 37.5 mg ) to take the place of 20 mg of Paxil? I don’t think so!!
nope best off dropping paxil by 5mg a day per week until off Remember, they may be very slight, if much at all. So much depends on how ‘you’ react, not how some others have.
true 150 mg of Effexor to 40 mg of Paxil??
or more since paxil is up to 17 times more potent at the synapse then prozac effexor hits multiple sites at higher doses and is basicaly serotonergic at lower ones so a sliding conversion may not be too bad-as a phenethylamine compound it excerts reuptake inhibition on serotonin first noradrenaline second and weakly dopaminergic thirdly so in some ways in works like a tca but in reverse where the tca hits adrenergic sites first serotonin sites second. it would be somewhat difficult to make a comparative dose per dose response due to the different pharmacokinetics and individual responses From what I understand, the XR should work out very well.
yes it would bot Rita and Philip use this med with good success You’re not alone..
Microbes are everywhere
Response:
Author:
admin on
Category:
Prozac Effexor
Tags: Prozac Effexor
Related Posts
Prescription Medication Knowledge Base » Eessential Tremor Effexor » Water…
Water…
Question:
I’ve noticed, and maybe it is bogus until next years allergy season comes around, but since I switched to water and not much else in May, I’ve had virtually no problem with allergies, not even when I flew to Houston in July. My breathing is WAY better than it used to be. Now, I don’t always have a lot of allergies in summer, but slightly stuffed up is not unusual for me. But I’ve not been all summer, except for one head cold. So I can see that yes, it might help asthmatics. Anyway, if anyone is an allergy sufferer, it may be worth a try. I should know more next spring… Cynthia G – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – For info, read http://dietchef.ecorp.net/articles/health/water.htm <snip I also just read that adequate hydration during exercise makes you able to breath much more efficiently. In fact, asthmatics who drank water while exercising cut way back on rescue inhaler use. If you are trying to lose weight, you should drink 64 ounces and then 8 ounces for each 25 pounds over weight you are. Once I actually made myself drink it, I find I crave it now. — claudia 565/355/157 To email me remove the potatoes Tipletter Writer for Dieting CyberTip4theDay Subscribe today: http://www.CyberTip4theDay.com For hundreds of free low-fat recipes and info visit Claudia’s Corner http://dietchef.ecorp.net Hi: How much water do you all drink? I have been trying to do about 50-60 oz. Is that enough? Perhaps we can setup intravenous water HAHAHAHHA thanks allen
Response:
Many in this newsgroup are more knowledgeable as to why we need to drink more… and I’ve often heard it said you should drink 64oz minimum PLUS an extra 8oz for every 25lbs you wish to lose. Someone else suggested that you half your weight and drink that many oz’s daily…. Drink up.. You’ll be glad you did.
here is the link: http://www.classicx.com/html/2super.html THE WATER QUESTION i not more knowledgeable than others, just great at grabbing links! rosie
Response:
I go through 2-2 litre pitchers a day. I think most people here drink more than that, but I remember a time when I thought drinking a 32 oz tumbler of water was a huge acomplishment! I found, the colder the water, the better. Lisa B. 243/223/160 "There is more to life than increasing its speed" – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi: How much water do you all drink? I have been trying to do about 50-60 oz. Is that enough? Perhaps we can setup intravenous water HAHAHAHHA thanks allen
Response:
For info, read http://dietchef.ecorp.net/articles/health/water.htm An average sized person who is a total couch potato and not trying to lose weight should drink a minimum of 64 ounces a day. If you are more active and/or trying to lose weight you need to drink a lot more. When you don’t drink a lot of water, you lose weight much more slowly. Weight loss occurs as your liver breaks down fat deposits and flushes them out of your body. But when you don’t drink enough water, your kidneys can not do their job and there fore your liver stops or slows metabolizing fat and helps the kidneys do their job. No matter what, your body will always by default make sure that you remain a live as long as possible. What your kidneys do is essential to survival, so by default the liver will take over some of it’s work. I also just read that adequate hydration during exercise makes you able to breath much more efficiently. In fact, asthmatics who drank water while exercising cut way back on rescue inhaler use. If you are trying to lose weight, you should drink 64 ounces and then 8 ounces for each 25 pounds over weight you are. Once I actually made myself drink it, I find I crave it now. — claudia 565/355/157 To email me remove the potatoes Tipletter Writer for Dieting CyberTip4theDay Subscribe today: http://www.CyberTip4theDay.com For hundreds of free low-fat recipes and info visit Claudia’s Corner http://dietchef.ecorp.net
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi: How much water do you all drink? I have been trying to do about 50-60 oz. Is that enough? Perhaps we can setup intravenous water HAHAHAHHA thanks allen
Response:
I like drinking water. I also have a weakness for soda. I drink about 6-8+ glasses of water today. I tell ya. I have known 4 people who have had kidney troubles this year. I’m not certain what caused it in each of the women, but I know I’m gonna drink my water! Denise http://www.chistell.com
Response:
I drink 100 oz./day…this is fairly new for me (only a week) but it is getting easier. Good Luck, Renee
Response:
Hi: How much water do you all drink? I have been trying to do about 50-60 oz. Is that enough? Perhaps we can setup intravenous water HAHAHAHHA thanks allen
Response:
brenda, although i follow the recomendation you mentioned below, my water intake is roughly 1/2 of my weight, ounce wise…..just a strange coinkydink with me Julie – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi Allen… I was one of those who rarely ever drank water, but I decided it was one of the things I was going to give an honest try this time around. I started out with what’s considered minimum water intake for everyone..8 x 8oz glasses per day or 64ozs. Within days, I had doubled it to 128ozs and it’s been the easiest change I could have ever made in my WOE. It helps to curb my hunger; it makes my entire body function better…and I feel much better. I now consider it one of the most important elements of my WOL. Many in this newsgroup are more knowledgeable as to why we need to drink more… and I’ve often heard it said you should drink 64oz minimum PLUS an extra 8oz for every 25lbs you wish to lose. Someone else suggested that you half your weight and drink that many oz’s daily…. Drink up.. You’ll be glad you did. Hi: How much water do you all drink? I have been trying to do about 50-60 oz. Is that enough? Perhaps we can setup intravenous water HAHAHAHHA thanks allen
Response:
Hi Allen… I was one of those who rarely ever drank water, but I decided it was one of the things I was going to give an honest try this time around. I started out with what’s considered minimum water intake for everyone..8 x 8oz glasses per day or 64ozs. Within days, I had doubled it to 128ozs and it’s been the easiest change I could have ever made in my WOE. It helps to curb my hunger; it makes my entire body function better…and I feel much better. I now consider it one of the most important elements of my WOL. Many in this newsgroup are more knowledgeable as to why we need to drink more… and I’ve often heard it said you should drink 64oz minimum PLUS an extra 8oz for every 25lbs you wish to lose. Someone else suggested that you half your weight and drink that many oz’s daily…. Drink up.. You’ll be glad you did.
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi: How much water do you all drink? I have been trying to do about 50-60 oz. Is that enough? Perhaps we can setup intravenous water HAHAHAHHA thanks allen
Response:
I like a good night’s sleep, so I usually don’t drink much water after about 9 PM unless I go for a walk later than that. I go to bed pretty late (midnightish) so that’s usually plenty of time so that I avoid having to pee all night. Katie 183/168/163 Y4K: 568 /4000 — To reply by e-mail, take out all the x’s.
I drink a ton of water everyday on everyone’s advice. But I try not to drink too much too late after one night a few nights ago waking up 3 times having to pee something terrible! LOL! Desert Wind 296/291/125 Please visit my website
Response:
i know about those late nite potty visits. my biggest problem is getting my eyes to open up enough so i don’t trip over the dogs!! lol-janzbug
Response:
Hi Desert Wind, The nights when I have to get up and pee during the night is one I cherish. That usually is followed by a woosh the next morning
Michael I drink a ton of water everyday on everyone’s advice. But I try not to drink too much too late after one night a few nights ago waking up 3 times having to pee something terrible! LOL! Desert Wind 296/291/125 Please visit my website
– 214/197.5/190 Lowfat/Lowcal since Aug 26
Response:
I drink a ton of water everyday on everyone’s advice. But I try not to drink too much too late after one night a few nights ago waking up 3 times having to pee something terrible! LOL! Desert Wind 296/291/125
Please visitmy website
Response:
Water!!!! I drink it when I read ASD, every time I see the word "water, drink, drank, or drunk." (It’s the ASD Drinking Game.
Other than that, I drink *at least* 64 oz. per day, plus extra glasses in little "water rituals" such as the ASD Drinking Game, whenever I’m waiting for food to cook in the microwave, or whenever I’m in class or studying. Claudia’s right about asthma too – I’ve had fewer problems breathing since I’ve been fully hydrated (which in turn cuts down on my essential tremor because I’m not taking my inhaler as much). Basically, water is just *the* thing. Ambrosia. The Elixer of Life. Live well, — soma 180/17?/135 Y2K 60/2000
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi: How much water do you all drink? I have been trying to do about 50-60 oz. Is that enough? Perhaps we can setup intravenous water HAHAHAHHA thanks allen
Response:
…..and a catheter! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi: How much water do you all drink? I have been trying to do about 50-60 oz. Is that enough? Perhaps we can setup intravenous water HAHAHAHHA thanks allen
Response:
Yep, I do think there is a relationship. I’ve been bad about drinking for two days now and I’ve noticed I am stuffier. Gotta go fill that water glass! Cynthia – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Cynthia, I noticed the same thing. All the more reason to drink that water. I’ve noticed, and maybe it is bogus until next years allergy season comes around, but since I switched to water and not much else in May, I’ve had virtually no problem with allergies, not even when I flew to Houston in July. My breathing is WAY better than it used to be.
Response:
Cynthia, I noticed the same thing. All the more reason to drink that water.
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’ve noticed, and maybe it is bogus until next years allergy season comes around, but since I switched to water and not much else in May, I’ve had virtually no problem with allergies, not even when I flew to Houston in July. My breathing is WAY better than it used to be. Now, I don’t always have a lot of allergies in summer, but slightly stuffed up is not unusual for me. But I’ve not been all summer, except for one head cold. So I can see that yes, it might help asthmatics. Anyway, if anyone is an allergy sufferer, it may be worth a try. I should know more next spring… Cynthia G For info, read http://dietchef.ecorp.net/articles/health/water.htm <snip I also just read that adequate hydration during exercise makes you able to breath much more efficiently. In fact, asthmatics who drank water while exercising cut way back on rescue inhaler use. If you are trying to lose weight, you should drink 64 ounces and then 8 ounces for each 25 pounds over weight you are. Once I actually made myself drink it, I find I crave it now. — claudia 565/355/157 To email me remove the potatoes Tipletter Writer for Dieting CyberTip4theDay Subscribe today: http://www.CyberTip4theDay.com For hundreds of free low-fat recipes and info visit Claudia’s Corner http://dietchef.ecorp.net Hi: How much water do you all drink? I have been trying to do about 50-60 oz. Is that enough? Perhaps we can setup intravenous water HAHAHAHHA thanks allen
Response:
Related Posts
Prescription Medication Knowledge Base » Effexor Withdrawal » These multiple threads suck
These multiple threads suck
Question:
Maybe it’s me on effexor withdrawal, but the proliferation of these multiple threads sucks. Is there a problem with some people’s browsers? Why can’t people continue the thread instead of splintering it into another category? It’s really irritating, especially since my browser is slow and so the extra scrolling, guessing if the discussion is a continuation or new takes a lot of time and money. basically, I’m otta here. Too slow. Best, AD Share what you know. Learn what you don’t.
Response:
Actually, a lot of your problem is your browser. Sure, people should be careful not to splinter threads, but a good browser will put most of that back where it goes. I see that you use Netscape3.01 Gold and Windows 95. Chances are that you have room on your hard drive for Agent, which will solve most of your problems. I used to get irritated at the same thing. Keith – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Maybe it’s me on effexor withdrawal, but the proliferation of these multiple threads sucks. Is there a problem with some people’s browsers? Why can’t people continue the thread instead of splintering it into another category? It’s really irritating, especially since my browser is slow and so the extra scrolling, guessing if the discussion is a continuation or new takes a lot of time and money. basically, I’m otta here. Too slow. Best, AD Share what you know. Learn what you don’t.
Response:
Related Posts
Prescription Medication Knowledge Base » Do Xanax And Zoloft Hinder Libido » New member to the group
New member to the group
Question:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – snipped Welcome to anx/pan Robb!
Opps Rony made a boo boo : Welcome to ASAP
snipped Rony. Thats what happens when you get addicted to #anx/pan Rony, it takes over your life to the extent that everywhere seems like its #anx/pan. Some fiendish plot of Jon’s to take over the world I suspect!!!! <VBG Ian Gosh! i really should get out more
)
Ian, I think we should ALL get out more. Karen
Response:
Welcome to ASAP Robb. You will find a lot of supportive and experienced people here to help you through this. Hello All, My name is Robb and I am new to this group. I am a 26 year old male who has just recently been diagnosed with panic disorder. About a month ago I was sitting at work listening to some music and writing code (I am a Webmaster for a marketing firm) when all of a sudden I went numb. My heart started pounding so hard it hurt, I got nauseated, dizzy, and started shaking. The worst part was my mind lost its sense of reality. At that exact point in time, all I could remember is wanting "out". I do believe that was a strong suicidal flash.
This may have been a panic attack, as they can cause all of the symptoms listed above. The feelings can certainly be overwhelming. From reading the rest of the posts in here, I can see I’m not alone. This syndrome has bothered me because in life, I’m the one people go to when everything falls apart. I’ve always been the solid one, the one who is in control all the time. The PA’s have changed all that. Now I fear doing many of the things that I used to enjoy because I might have an attack. I hate to complain about my medical insurance since my company pays for it 100%, but it is an HMO, so I still haven’t been to see a psychologist. I have been to counseling and have seen my physician who has me on Xanax and Zoloft. The only thing the Xanax does for me is make me groggy, but many times that’s enough. I have no idea if the Zoloft is doing anything. I hope when I see the psychologist next month he will be able to determine the correct medication to help this along.
You may want to see a psychiatrist specializing in anxiety disorders, being you are already on medication. How long have you been taking Xanax and Zoloft, and what doses? The grogginess may soon wear off, your body needs to adjust to the med. It does sound like Xanax is already helping, give both meds some time to work fully. I HATE drugs, especially anything that makes me feel disconnected, but in contrast to the panic attacks, I’ll deal with them for the time being. Ok, this will be enough for my first posting. I just wanted to say thank you to all of you out there who’s stories I’ve read. Although the severity of these attacks have lessened over the past month, they still bother me. However, I find it comforting to know that I am not "going crazy" and that this is truly problem with physical roots as well. Robb
Most of us feel the way you do, we don’t like taking meds. But given the choice between PA’s and taking the meds, it’s an easy choice. You certainly aren’t going crazy, although panic can make it seem that way. Let us know how you progress. Ray Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it – even if I have said it – unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Response:
writes – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – snipped Welcome to anx/pan Robb!
Opps Rony made a boo boo : Welcome to ASAP
snipped Rony. Thats what happens when you get addicted to #anx/pan Rony, it takes over your life to the extent that everywhere seems like its #anx/pan. Some fiendish plot of Jon’s to take over the world I suspect!!!! <VBG Ian
Curses – I am undone
— Jon Guite When replying by email, please remove the trailing x from my return address
Response:
I am also a new member. For years ,,I felt very stressed and anxious but no name/diagnosis was really given. Then I married….a wonderful man and we had 2 childred. While in my 30’s he died suddenly (he was same age) of a heart attack. A month to the day later my Mother died suddenly. Two weeks after that,,,my son almost lost his eye,,and had permanent damage as well as severe bleeding from incident. i had started a new job (was not working prior) A year later I had a major car accident. A few years later I wound up in the hospital for a month with severe asthma and major meds. The doctor (pulmonary specialist) felt that the asthma was worsened from "stuffed symptons" so to speak. He put me on an antidepressant. Then I went off that. A few years later my heart started to race and I felt nervous. The MD prescribed Verapamil which helped a bit. Now,,,,I have a stressful job,,(one I am not fond of anymore. I seem to start worrying over things and can’t stop. Kind of obsessing. I went to Dr and he upped dosage of Verapamil to 240 mg a day,,and gave me a prescription for Lorazepam….1//2 to 1 mg daily "as needed" I feel good but sometimes drowsy. I need to concentrate on my job. I have an HMO and right now a psychiatrist is not an option. My son is 23,,,and believe he has OCD. BUt he refuses to take medication. SO SORRY for this long post. I don’t have panic per se,,,thank GOd I can go places without panicking,,but have this anxiety a lot but not all the time. i had gone to a pychologist before (with other insurance) In the past several doctors advised me that I had to learn to cope with my stress and of course having gone thru what I did it was normal. I don’t know why I was not diagosed before. I am now 50 and feel that I felt anxious for years when I need not have been. I can’t change the past,,,but am wondering if Lorazepam helps,,should I keep taking it? Worried about long lasting problems. Thanks again,,I guess I must have gen anxiety disorder though dr did not give it a name. Can this be worsened by the events I went thru and why 13 years later,,,are things getting worse? Thanks for listening,,,and again sorry for this long post which I hope you can make sense out of. Best to all Linda
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – snipped Welcome to anx/pan Robb!
Opps Rony made a boo boo : Welcome to ASAP
snipped Rony. Thats what happens when you get addicted to #anx/pan Rony, it takes over your life to the extent that everywhere seems like its #anx/pan. Some fiendish plot of Jon’s to take over the world I suspect!!!! <VBG Ian
ROFL!! Hi Ian! Hope you are doing well! Steph
Response:
snipped Thats what happens when you get addicted to #anx/pan Rony, it takes over your life to the extent that everywhere seems like its #anx/pan. Some fiendish plot of Jon’s to take over the world I suspect!!!! <VBG Ian ROFL!! Hi Ian! Hope you are doing well! Steph
Yep, I’m doing okay, thanks for asking. :-) Ian
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I am also a new member. For years ,,I felt very stressed and anxious but no name/diagnosis was really given. Then I married….a wonderful man and we had 2 childred. While in my 30’s he died suddenly (he was same age) of a heart attack. A month to the day later my Mother died suddenly. Two weeks after that,,,my son almost lost his eye,,and had permanent damage as well as severe bleeding from incident. i had started a new job (was not working prior) A year later I had a major car accident. A few years later I wound up in the hospital for a month with severe asthma and major meds. The doctor (pulmonary specialist) felt that the asthma was worsened from "stuffed symptons" so to speak. He put me on an antidepressant. Then I went off that. A few years later my heart started to race and I felt nervous. The MD prescribed Verapamil which helped a bit. Now,,,,I have a stressful job,,(one I am not fond of anymore. I seem to start worrying over things and can’t stop. Kind of obsessing. I went to Dr and he upped dosage of Verapamil to 240 mg a day,,and gave me a prescription for Lorazepam….1//2 to 1 mg daily "as needed" I feel good but sometimes drowsy. I need to concentrate on my job. I have an HMO and right now a psychiatrist is not an option. My son is 23,,,and believe he has OCD. BUt he refuses to take medication. SO SORRY for this long post. I don’t have panic per se,,,thank GOd I can go places without panicking,,but have this anxiety a lot but not all the time. i had gone to a pychologist before (with other insurance) In the past several doctors advised me that I had to learn to cope with my stress and of course having gone thru what I did it was normal. I don’t know why I was not diagosed before. I am now 50 and feel that I felt anxious for years when I need not have been. I can’t change the past,,,but am wondering if Lorazepam helps,,should I keep taking it? Worried about long lasting problems. Thanks again,,I guess I must have gen anxiety disorder though dr did not give it a name. Can this be worsened by the events I went thru and why 13 years later,,,are things getting worse? Thanks for listening,,,and again sorry for this long post which I hope you can make sense out of. Best to all Linda
Hi Linda and welcome to ASAP! You’ve been through a lot – too much really and I’m sorry about that. An anxiety disorder can manifest itself any time although the risk gets smaller with age after a certain age. But then it seems you’ve been doping with anxiety for years now and yes, there may come a time when taking meds is sensible and that time may well be now. I think you may suffer from GAD with OCD-overtones but nobody – let alone non-professionals like us here – can diagnose someone else over the net. Wouldn’t it be possible to see a psychiatrist specialized in anxiety disorders in a program with gliding scales or something like that? I feel it’s important to be properly diagnosed and then get prescribed the relevant med(s). In the meatime I wonder why you’re taking *Verapramil* fopr anxiety for which it is, as a calcium blocker used for hypertension and certain cardiac problems, not a first choice med at all. A benzo like lorazepam may work. If it doesn’t you might want to try Xanax (alprazolam). You will bezome dependent on benzos when taking them for a longer period but this just means that if and when you decide to stop taking them you’ll have to do a slow taper in order to avoid withdrawal symptoms. Benzos have been life-savers for many GAD and PD-sufferer. I think the proof is in the pudding. *If it works, it works*. NBut you should see to it that you’re not undermedicated. 1/2 to 1 mgs of lorazepam may be fine to take *as needed* but if you’re experience anxiety all the time you might be better off on a regular dose and as lorazepam (the same goes for Xanax) is a short acting benzo you would need to take it three times a day or so. I hope it will help you, you are entitled to some peace of mind…. Philip
Response:
Hello All, My name is Robb and I am new to this group. I am a 26 year old male who has just recently been diagnosed with panic disorder. About a month ago I was sitting at work listening to some music and writing code (I am a Webmaster for a marketing firm) when all of a sudden I went numb. My heart started pounding so hard it hurt, I got nauseated, dizzy, and started shaking. The worst part was my mind lost its sense of reality. At that exact point in time, all I could remember is wanting "out". I do believe that was a strong suicidal flash. From reading the rest of the posts in here, I can see I’m not alone. This syndrome has bothered me because in life, I’m the one people go to when everything falls apart. I’ve always been the solid one, the one who is in control all the time. The PA’s have changed all that. Now I fear doing many of the things that I used to enjoy because I might have an attack. I hate to complain about my medical insurance since my company pays for it 100%, but it is an HMO, so I still haven’t been to see a psychologist. I have been to counseling and have seen my physician who has me on Xanax and Zoloft. The only thing the Xanax does for me is make me groggy, but many times that’s enough. I have no idea if the Zoloft is doing anything. I hope when I see the psychologist next month he will be able to determine the correct medication to help this along. I HATE drugs, especially anything that makes me feel disconnected, but in contrast to the panic attacks, I’ll deal with them for the time being. Ok, this will be enough for my first posting. I just wanted to say thank you to all of you out there who’s stories I’ve read. Although the severity of these attacks have lessened over the past month, they still bother me. However, I find it comforting to know that I am not "going crazy" and that this is truly problem with physical roots as well. Robb
Response:
Hi Robb,
Welcome to ASAP. You have come to a place where you will meet, so to speak, people who are dealing with the same issues as you. Please feel free to post as often as you feel the need. There are quite a few well informed people in this NG that are a great help and inspiration to all of us. Once again, welcome..smile. Mary Kay – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Hello All, My name is Robb and I am new to this group. I am a 26 year old male who has just recently been diagnosed with panic disorder. About a month ago I was sitting at work listening to some music and writing code (I am a Webmaster for a marketing firm) when all of a sudden I went numb. My heart started pounding so hard it hurt, I got nauseated, dizzy, and started shaking. The worst part was my mind lost its sense of reality. At that exact point in time, all I could remember is wanting "out". I do believe that was a strong suicidal flash. From reading the rest of the posts in here, I can see I’m not alone. This syndrome has bothered me because in life, I’m the one people go to when everything falls apart. I’ve always been the solid one, the one who is in control all the time. The PA’s have changed all that. Now I fear doing many of the things that I used to enjoy because I might have an attack. I hate to complain about my medical insurance since my company pays for it 100%, but it is an HMO, so I still haven’t been to see a psychologist. I have been to counseling and have seen my physician who has me on Xanax and Zoloft. The only thing the Xanax does for me is make me groggy, but many times that’s enough. I have no idea if the Zoloft is doing anything. I hope when I see the psychologist next month he will be able to determine the correct medication to help this along. I HATE drugs, especially anything that makes me feel disconnected, but in contrast to the panic attacks, I’ll deal with them for the time being. Ok, this will be enough for my first posting. I just wanted to say thank you to all of you out there who’s stories I’ve read. Although the severity of these attacks have lessened over the past month, they still bother me. However, I find it comforting to know that I am not "going crazy" and that this is truly problem with physical roots as well. Robb
Response:
The only thing the Xanax does for me is make me groggy, but many times that’s enough. I have no idea if the Zoloft is doing anything. I hope when I see the psychologist next month he will be able to determine the correct medication to help this along.
Robb, You didn’t mention if your doctor said anything, so I’ll just add that the Zoloft will take several weeks to have any effect. If it’s a psychologist you’re seeing, but not a psychiatrist, the psychologist will not be able to prescribe drugs but if s/he has experience in panic/anxiety s/he will be aware of what drugs are out there and how they are used and to what effect. In the meantime, don’t give up on the drugs simply because you are anti-drug. (Like another poster said, you wouldn’t refuse insulin if you were diabetic would you?) Give the Zoloft time to have an effect. Best of luck.
Response:
I get the psychiatrist / psychologist thing messed up all the time. I meant psychiatrist. And I’ve done tons of research through the web about the Zoloft and realize it can take up to 6 weeks to have any effect. Sorry about being dense
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – You didn’t mention if your doctor said anything, so I’ll just add that the Zoloft will take several weeks to have any effect. If it’s a psychologist you’re seeing, but not a psychiatrist, the psychologist will not be able to prescribe drugs but if s/he has experience in panic/anxiety s/he will be aware of what drugs are out there and how they are used and to what effect. In the meantime, don’t give up on the drugs simply because you are anti-drug. (Like another poster said, you wouldn’t refuse insulin if you were diabetic would you?) Give the Zoloft time to have an effect. Best of luck.
Response:
Hello All, My name is Robb and I am new to this group. I am a 26 year old male who has just recently been diagnosed with panic disorder.
<snip
. My heart started pounding so hard it hurt, I got nauseated, dizzy, and started shaking. The worst part was my mind lost its sense of reality.
<snip Sounds like you had a derealization episoide too
…. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – From reading the rest of the posts in here, I can see I’m not alone. This syndrome has bothered me because in life, I’m the one people go to when everything falls apart. I’ve always been the solid one, the one who is in control all the time. The PA’s have changed all that. Now I fear doing many of the things that I used to enjoy because I might have an attack. I hate to complain about my medical insurance since my company pays for it 100%, but it is an HMO, so I still haven’t been to see a psychologist. I have been to counseling and have seen my physician who has me on Xanax and Zoloft. The only thing the Xanax does for me is make me groggy, but many times that’s enough. I have no idea if the Zoloft is doing anything. I hope when I see the psychologist next month he will be able to determine the correct medication to help this along. I HATE drugs, especially anything that makes me feel disconnected, but in contrast to the panic attacks, I’ll deal with them for the time being. Ok, this will be enough for my first posting. I just wanted to say thank you to all of you out there who’s stories I’ve read. Although the severity of these attacks have lessened over the past month, they still bother me. However, I find it comforting to know that I am not "going crazy" and that this is truly problem with physical roots as well. Robb
Welcome to anx/pan Robb!
give the Zolfot a chance , it can take a while to take effect, so hang in there. And yes your right you are not going crazy!. Please let us know how you get on with the meds, i’m sure you wi ll be feeling some relief before long
) Rony. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hello All, My name is Robb and I am new to this group. I am a 26 year old male who has just recently been diagnosed with panic disorder. <snip
. My heart started pounding so hard it hurt, I got nauseated, dizzy, and started shaking. The worst part was my mind lost its sense of reality. <snip Sounds like you had a derealization episoide too
…. From reading the rest of the posts in here, I can see I’m not alone. This syndrome has bothered me because in life, I’m the one people go to when everything falls apart. I’ve always been the solid one, the one who is in control all the time. The PA’s have changed all that. Now I fear doing many of the things that I used to enjoy because I might have an attack. I hate to complain about my medical insurance since my company pays for it 100%, but it is an HMO, so I still haven’t been to see a psychologist. I have been to counseling and have seen my physician who has me on Xanax and Zoloft. The only thing the Xanax does for me is make me groggy, but many times that’s enough. I have no idea if the Zoloft is doing anything. I hope when I see the psychologist next month he will be able to determine the correct medication to help this along. I HATE drugs, especially anything that makes me feel disconnected, but in contrast to the panic attacks, I’ll deal with them for the time being. Ok, this will be enough for my first posting. I just wanted to say thank you to all of you out there who’s stories I’ve read. Although the severity of these attacks have lessened over the past month, they still bother me. However, I find it comforting to know that I am not "going crazy" and that this is truly problem with physical roots as well. Robb Welcome to anx/pan Robb!
Opps Rony made a boo boo : Welcome to ASAP
give the Zolfot a chance , i
t can take a while to take effect, so hang in there. And yes your right you are not going crazy!. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Please let us know how you get on with the meds, i’m sure you wi ll be feeling some relief before long
) Rony.
Response:
Hi Rob, welcome to ASAP, Your story isn’t all that uncommon, nor is the fact that you are a computer geek
We seem to have a disproportionately high number of comp wizards here (probably some so far undocumented Microsoft bug IMO). And most of us were the bedrock that others clung to in times of crisis. It can be a really weird disorder that way, hitting you where you thought you were strongest!!!! Go figure!!!
Good luck Ian – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – My name is Robb and I am new to this group. I am a 26 year old male who has just recently been diagnosed with panic disorder. About a month ago I was sitting at work listening to some music and writing code (I am a Webmaster for a marketing firm) when all of a sudden I went numb. My heart started pounding so hard it hurt, I got nauseated, dizzy, and started shaking. The worst part was my mind lost its sense of reality. At that exact point in time, all I could remember is wanting "out". I do believe that was a strong suicidal flash. From reading the rest of the posts in here, I can see I’m not alone. This syndrome has bothered me because in life, I’m the one people go to when everything falls apart. I’ve always been the solid one, the one who is in control all the time. The PA’s have changed all that. Now I fear doing many of the things that I used to enjoy because I might have an attack. I hate to complain about my medical insurance since my company pays for it 100%, but it is an HMO, so I still haven’t been to see a psychologist. I have been to counseling and have seen my physician who has me on Xanax and Zoloft. The only thing the Xanax does for me is make me groggy, but many times that’s enough. I have no idea if the Zoloft is doing anything. I hope when I see the psychologist next month he will be able to determine the correct medication to help this along. I HATE drugs, especially anything that makes me feel disconnected, but in contrast to the panic attacks, I’ll deal with them for the time being. Ok, this will be enough for my first posting. I just wanted to say thank you to all of you out there who’s stories I’ve read. Although the severity of these attacks have lessened over the past month, they still bother me. However, I find it comforting to know that I am not "going crazy" and that this is truly problem with physical roots as well. Robb
Response:
snipped Welcome to anx/pan Robb!
Opps Rony made a boo boo : Welcome to ASAP
snipped Rony.
Thats what happens when you get addicted to #anx/pan Rony, it takes over your life to the extent that everywhere seems like its #anx/pan. Some fiendish plot of Jon’s to take over the world I suspect!!!! <VBG Ian
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – snipped Welcome to anx/pan Robb!
Opps Rony made a boo boo : Welcome to ASAP
snipped Rony. Thats what happens when you get addicted to #anx/pan Rony, it takes over your life to the extent that everywhere seems like its #anx/pan. Some fiendish plot of Jon’s to take over the world I suspect!!!! <VBG Ian
Gosh! i really should get out more
)
Response:
Related Posts
Prescription Medication Knowledge Base » Discontinue Use Of Zoloft In Lewy Body Caus » Scott Weiser Related Discussions
Scott Weiser Related Discussions
Question:
ENOUGH WITH THE DAMN ACCESS DEBATE THREADS! Living in the UK, I frequently unsubscribe from rec.boats.paddle because there’s too much which isn’t relevant to the UK paddler. When I resubscribe (as I did last month), I’m always delighted when I find that Scott Weiser is still winding up paddlers, especially in the US. Best wishes
What a compliment. Many thanks…. Regards, Scott Weiser ****** "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend upon my friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" ****** http://www.dimensional.com/~weiser/ Copyright 1998 by Scott Weiser Under the UCC, by the act of transmitting any commercial e-mail advertisment to this address, you are expressly contracting with me in my professional capacity for a consultation on the ad’s effectiveness and you expressly agree to pay to me the sum of $250.00 for each such consultation within 10 days of my report to the original sending address. You further expressly agree that all actions for recovery of fees owed shall be subject solely to the laws of the State of Colorado, which shall have sole jurisdiction.
Response:
ENOUGH WITH THE DAMN ACCESS DEBATE THREADS!
Living in the UK, I frequently unsubscribe from rec.boats.paddle because there’s too much which isn’t relevant to the UK paddler. When I resubscribe (as I did last month), I’m always delighted when I find that Scott Weiser is still winding up paddlers, especially in the US. Best wishes Keith — |/| |_ |_) |_) / / canoeing instead of climbing when I | | |__ | | / __/ realised I could swim but not fly!"
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – It’s all well and good to say that you, one individual boater, does no identifiable harm, but this ignores the impacts of scale, and when a hundred, or a thousand, or ten thousand boaters use the area, the cumulative impacts become significant. Just look at the Grand Canyon. yes – and that’s why most public lands that incur use impacts are placed in management plans. These plans seek to find the right balance – though I’ll admit it can be arbitrary – especially when it comes to mulltiple-use determinations. It’s a delicate balance of the two, but remember that preserving to pass stewardship on does *not* necessarily mean passing it to the public who want to use the land for recreation. indeed. the ‘public’ is the government. All land public or private is regulation by Federal, State, and local laws that prevent land-owners from using their land when the impacts of such use affect the public. If you don’t believe this.. try something like a 1000 head feed-lot on your property… or placer mining… or eve condos… none of these will you do without a ‘permit’ and the government decides on behalf of the public if your proposal is ‘in the public interest’. Some folks of late consider these ‘takings’ but underlying ‘public interest’ concept is intact.
This is true, and I’ve never denied the validity of properly constructed land-use law, but *restricting* a property owner’s use to protect the health, welfare and safety of the public is substantially different from *appropriating* his property for the use of the public. But this is true ONLY IF the 100 cattle *do* damage the riverbank. Such impacts are not really comparative in nature. Negative impacts cause by paddlers are not "better", or "less negative" impacts simply because they are caused by a paddler instead of a cow, they stand on their own, and when those impacts are unnecessary to begin with, they are that much more improper. hmmm.. they *are* comparative in terms of impacts… whether it is recreation, farming, mining.. all of these distill down to impacts that can be quantified in terms of water quality, habitat destruction, etc.
Yes, but an unnecessary impact is an unnecessary impact, no matter how small it may be. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Cattle may cause negative impacts, which can be mitigated by proper management practices, but cattle are *necessary* impacts in most cases, because they are what pay the taxes and create the profits that are used to continue to preserve the area. It’s all well and good to say "cattle-free in 2003" or whatever (though this mostly applies to federal lands) but the bills have to get paid somehow. I suppose when paddlers fork over the thousands of dollars a year to pay the taxes and maintain the property, then I’ll consider allowing them to trespass. Until then, their impacts, however slight, are *not necessary* to the preservation of the resource, and therefore they are justifiably banned. "can be mitigated by proper management practices" leaves it up to the landowner whoever that happens to be at a given time. this does not work when money is involved. Many landowners justify the destruction of the land they own for ‘economic benefits’. You are not unilaterally entitled to un-regulated economic activity just because you own the land. Your activity has to be compatible with the ‘public interest’ as there is hardly anything (economic) you can do on your property that won’t ultimately affect the public. There are thousands and thousands of local, state, federal laws that restrict you every which way from Sunday. You may consider recreation not necessary – the public may think otherwise – the same goes for what you think is ‘necessary’. If you public disagrees with you then you may be restricted.
Absolutely correct, but the fact that the government may regulate my activities in the public interest has no nexus to my ability to regulate YOUR activities on my land. As we have seen, even the government recognizes the impacts of recreationalists on public waters and has chosen to regulate them as well. I’m not sure what your point is. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’am also amused by the ’scaring the wildlife’ argument – somewhat because there may be a ‘hint’ of truth for some species but how many species in the last few decades have been not only ’scared’ but just plain wiped-out because the habitat they lived on was used by the landowner for ‘other purposes’? Again, you are comparing apples and oranges. The fact that species and habitat may have been impacted by landowners is a broad generalization and an irrelevant comparison. In my case this is not the case, as is true in many other places, and you cannot claim that your impacts are legitimate merely because other impacts occur. Your impacts stand alone, on their own merits, and you are not excused by the bad behavior of others. Using your logic, you should be able to toss beer cans on the bank, leave rubbish around and cut down trees for firewood just because somebody else does so somewhere else. That’s fallacious logic at best. I follow the consistency argument and agree but behavior is governed by law whether it occurs on private or public property – though different laws may apply depending on the behavior – for instance some usually can be arrested for ’speeding on your property’ because the law does not apply to private property.
I don’t understand. You seem to be contradicting yourself. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – If the ’scaring the wildlife’ arugment were true then most of the official ‘wild & scenic’ rivers in this nation – which are heavily travelled by recreation paddlers – would be completely devoid of wildlife. The reverse is true – once the land is dedicated by recreational use ONLY – the wildlife return and thrive.. and with the exception of certain ’shy’ species become confortable with humans – especially if they are not shooting them. It’s not the presence of the human itself that disturbs most animals – it is WHAT the human is doing and animals *know* that there is risk is hanging around. This is simply not true. No one said that the riparian zone would become ‘devoid’ of life, and while wildlife may become habituated to some degree, the stresses of human intrusion *remain* to negatively affect populations and vigor. And that wildlife you may see, which may be habituated, ignores those "shy" species, which are in the majority, which may indeed leave the area altogether, or may simply begin a gradual decline. Our federal lands are managed for *multiple* use with the recognition that humans *will* have impacts, and those impacts are balanced against the benefits which accrue to the public. Factually, from a political point of view, it would be highly desireable to simply forbid human access to *most* wilderness areas in order to preserve the habitat, but it’s politically impossible to do so, so we instead try to mitigate the impacts we do have. That’s why permit systems are cropping up on more and more rivers. The impacts of scale have become clear and limitations are required to preserve the resource. Indeed – with respect to ‘wilderness designation’, it’s not the paddlers or recreation folks or environmentalists that are fighting it.. it’s the folks that want to build roads and use motors. Impacts from recreation are easily mitigated.. you employ a permit system and if an area has eagle nests.. then you close it off entirely. The right fringe/landowner rights movement is trying to strike down all of these laws.. they want it all wide open … so that power boats, ski doos, etc can you AND the impacts ARE comparative. 100 canoes CAN and ARE compared to 100 ski-doos. One single four-wheel drive can severly damage a trail… and it has become recognized that hikers can do but it’ll take a 1000 of them… so you permit the use.. no 4-wheel and only 10 hikers per day.. etc etc
True, but largely irrelevant. You do prove my point however that mitigating and preventing impacts is a legitimate method of preserving the resource. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The ‘difficulty’ is that if Colorado actually did what you suggest – that there would be a firestorm and the arugment would be over with very quickly. You would lose big time. Very significant tourism and the public’s perception of being ‘welcome’ are involved. No sane public official would even consider it.. that’ why they’re content to let it be the way it is. Public officials don’t make the decisions, wrong… if the public doesn’t like the court decision they’ll change the law. The ‘law’ is determined by the legislature which consists of publically-elected officials. the Courts do. No amount of feverish desire in pursuit of the almighty dollar can prevent me, or someone else from filing a suit in court claiming an improper taking of private property for public use without just compensation. That’s the purpose of the Constitution, to prevent the tyranny of the majority and the infringements of the rights of the individual by the public. yep…but even the constition can be ammended if the people want it.
True, and when you succeed in repealing the Fifth Amendment, get back to me. While you are technically correct, you must recognize that private property ownership and the prohibitions against the government exproprating property without compensation are one of the core beliefs of our nation, and it’s simply not credible that the vast majority of the public, *who are property owners*, will tear up the Constitution simply to suit a *small number* of boating recreationists who aren’t satisfied with the public … read more »
Response:
It’s all well and good to say that you, one individual boater, does no identifiable harm, but this ignores the impacts of scale, and when a hundred, or a thousand, or ten thousand boaters use the area, the cumulative impacts become significant. Just look at the Grand Canyon.
yes – and that’s why most public lands that incur use impacts are placed in management plans. These plans seek to find the right balance – though I’ll admit it can be arbitrary – especially when it comes to mulltiple-use determinations. It’s a delicate balance of the two, but remember that preserving to pass stewardship on does *not* necessarily mean passing it to the public who want to use the land for recreation.
indeed. the ‘public’ is the government. All land public or private is regulation by Federal, State, and local laws that prevent land-owners from using their land when the impacts of such use affect the public. If you don’t believe this.. try something like a 1000 head feed-lot on your property… or placer mining… or eve condos… none of these will you do without a ‘permit’ and the government decides on behalf of the public if your proposal is ‘in the public interest’. Some folks of late consider these ‘takings’ but underlying ‘public interest’ concept is intact. But this is true ONLY IF the 100 cattle *do* damage the riverbank. Such impacts are not really comparative in nature. Negative impacts cause by paddlers are not "better", or "less negative" impacts simply because they are caused by a paddler instead of a cow, they stand on their own, and when those impacts are unnecessary to begin with, they are that much more improper.
hmmm.. they *are* comparative in terms of impacts… whether it is recreation, farming, mining.. all of these distill down to impacts that can be quantified in terms of water quality, habitat destruction, etc. Cattle may cause negative impacts, which can be mitigated by proper management practices, but cattle are *necessary* impacts in most cases, because they are what pay the taxes and create the profits that are used to continue to preserve the area. It’s all well and good to say "cattle-free in 2003" or whatever (though this mostly applies to federal lands) but the bills have to get paid somehow. I suppose when paddlers fork over the thousands of dollars a year to pay the taxes and maintain the property, then I’ll consider allowing them to trespass. Until then, their impacts, however slight, are *not necessary* to the preservation of the resource, and therefore they are justifiably banned.
"can be mitigated by proper management practices" leaves it up to the landowner whoever that happens to be at a given time. this does not work when money is involved. Many landowners justify the destruction of the land they own for ‘economic benefits’. You are not unilaterally entitled to un-regulated economic activity just because you own the land. Your activity has to be compatible with the ‘public interest’ as there is hardly anything (economic) you can do on your property that won’t ultimately affect the public. There are thousands and thousands of local, state, federal laws that restrict you every which way from Sunday. You may consider recreation not necessary – the public may think otherwise – the same goes for what you think is ‘necessary’. If you public disagrees with you then you may be restricted. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’am also amused by the ’scaring the wildlife’ argument – somewhat because there may be a ‘hint’ of truth for some species but how many species in the last few decades have been not only ’scared’ but just plain wiped-out because the habitat they lived on was used by the landowner for ‘other purposes’? Again, you are comparing apples and oranges. The fact that species and habitat may have been impacted by landowners is a broad generalization and an irrelevant comparison. In my case this is not the case, as is true in many other places, and you cannot claim that your impacts are legitimate merely because other impacts occur. Your impacts stand alone, on their own merits, and you are not excused by the bad behavior of others. Using your logic, you should be able to toss beer cans on the bank, leave rubbish around and cut down trees for firewood just because somebody else does so somewhere else. That’s fallacious logic at best.
I follow the consistency argument and agree but behavior is governed by law whether it occurs on private or public property – though different laws may apply depending on the behavior – for instance some usually can be arrested for ’speeding on your property’ because the law does not apply to private property. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – If the ’scaring the wildlife’ arugment were true then most of the official ‘wild & scenic’ rivers in this nation – which are heavily travelled by recreation paddlers – would be completely devoid of wildlife. The reverse is true – once the land is dedicated by recreational use ONLY – the wildlife return and thrive.. and with the exception of certain ’shy’ species become confortable with humans – especially if they are not shooting them. It’s not the presence of the human itself that disturbs most animals – it is WHAT the human is doing and animals *know* that there is risk is hanging around. This is simply not true. No one said that the riparian zone would become ‘devoid’ of life, and while wildlife may become habituated to some degree, the stresses of human intrusion *remain* to negatively affect populations and vigor. And that wildlife you may see, which may be habituated, ignores those "shy" species, which are in the majority, which may indeed leave the area altogether, or may simply begin a gradual decline. Our federal lands are managed for *multiple* use with the recognition that humans *will* have impacts, and those impacts are balanced against the benefits which accrue to the public. Factually, from a political point of view, it would be highly desireable to simply forbid human access to *most* wilderness areas in order to preserve the habitat, but it’s politically impossible to do so, so we instead try to mitigate the impacts we do have. That’s why permit systems are cropping up on more and more rivers. The impacts of scale have become clear and limitations are required to preserve the resource.
Indeed – with respect to ‘wilderness designation’, it’s not the paddlers or recreation folks or environmentalists that are fighting it.. it’s the folks that want to build roads and use motors. Impacts from recreation are easily mitigated.. you employ a permit system and if an area has eagle nests.. then you close it off entirely. The right fringe/landowner rights movement is trying to strike down all of these laws.. they want it all wide open … so that power boats, ski doos, etc can you AND the impacts ARE comparative. 100 canoes CAN and ARE compared to 100 ski-doos. One single four-wheel drive can severly damage a trail… and it has become recognized that hikers can do but it’ll take a 1000 of them… so you permit the use.. no 4-wheel and only 10 hikers per day.. etc etc The ‘difficulty’ is that if Colorado actually did what you suggest – that there would be a firestorm and the arugment would be over with very quickly. You would lose big time. Very significant tourism and the public’s perception of being ‘welcome’ are involved. No sane public official would even consider it.. that’ why they’re content to let it be the way it is. Public officials don’t make the decisions,
wrong… if the public doesn’t like the court decision they’ll change the law. The ‘law’ is determined by the legislature which consists of publically-elected officials. the Courts do. No amount of feverish desire in pursuit of the almighty dollar can prevent me, or someone else from filing a suit in court claiming an improper taking of private property for public use without just compensation. That’s the purpose of the Constitution, to prevent the tyranny of the majority and the infringements of the rights of the individual by the public.
yep…but even the constition can be ammended if the people want it. If I were to do as I suggest, *something* would happen, either the trespassers would be arrested, or *I* would be arrested for "illegally" preventing them from trespassing, or they would file a suit, or I would. And as soon as the matter comes to court, the LAW rules, and I am quite confident in the strength of my legal case.
Like I said… if the law in Colorado was rigidly enforced along the lines that you suggest… and paddlers were kicked off of the major streams.. you could expect the law to change – regardless of how the courts feel. When you have a law like they have in Colorado and it’s not enforced.. there is a message in it. Federal Laws can force changes in Colorado law also – and do all the time. In the end… in a democracy… "rights" are decided by the people. You have no "right" to economic activity or even landowner rights if the public that votes disagrees with you. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Regards, Scott Weiser ****** "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend upon my friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" ****** http://www.dimensional.com/~weiser/ Copyright 1998 by Scott Weiser Under the UCC, by the act of transmitting any commercial e-mail advertisment to this address, you are expressly contracting with me in my professional capacity for a consultation on the ad’s effectiveness and you expressly agree to pay to me the sum of $250.00 for each such consultation within 10 days of my report to the original sending address. You further expressly agree that all actions for recovery of fees owed shall be subject solely to the laws of the State of Colorado, which shall have sole
… read more »
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Correct, and the point is that *somebody* just might own such places, and you could lose the access in a heartbeat due to the malefactions of one or two individual paddlers. yep – actually this is more common that most folks either know or will admit. In Virginia – The Cowpasture River ( not great whitewater but a really beautify mountain river) is essentially off-limits. Others include Back Creek and the Jackson. Had a little old lady point a long-barreled 45 at our group on the Bullpasture. She wanted us off of "her damned land" NOW! People have been arrested in the past and many others are "warned" by local landowners before they even put in. Interestingly, we *used* to be able to get permission from the landowner group for a number of years and then suddenly we were refused. Not because we had done anything wrong – we ALWAYS sought permission and ALWAYS were polite – but because 1 landowner out of dozens didn’t want ANYBODY and didn’t care whether they were polite or respectful or anything else. End of story. All of years of carefully trying to not step on anyones toes went for naught. Um….I think this qualifies as a "broad generalization" of the type which Richard was objecting to when applied to paddlers, so I guess I have to object to it when applied to "landowners". After all, my purpose is not to develop or destroy the resource, it’s to protect it from the damage caused by public use. yep, i erred in the generalization. there is a link however. I don’t buy your ‘protection’ argument. I’ve paddled hundreds of rivers in 30 years of boating and damage, if any, is miniscule compared to cattle, 4 wheelers, local trash dumps, roadside dumps, fishermen – believe it of not!, logging, farming, and industry.
This may be true elsewhere, but the fact that others may cause more damage does not reduce the impacts which boaters cause, and since whatever those impacts are are unnecessary, it’s perfectly proper to prevent them. Actually, of late, many rivers have been saved from damage by pointing out that they are used significantly for recreation. also interesting is that once a River becomes officially protected and becomes a destination for paddlers – the localities reap economic benefit AND the river then becomes essentially off-limits to single-minded proposals that *would* damage it.
If economic benefits were the only criteria perhaps this would be valid. You do make a valid point that public awareness of the particular value of a particular river can be helpful in protecting the resource, but far too often the negative impacts of public access do more harm than good. It’s all well and good to say that you, one individual boater, does no identifiable harm, but this ignores the impacts of scale, and when a hundred, or a thousand, or ten thousand boaters use the area, the cumulative impacts become significant. Just look at the Grand Canyon. It’s a delicate balance of the two, but remember that preserving to pass stewardship on does *not* necessarily mean passing it to the public who want to use the land for recreation. I don’t think it is a ‘delicate balance’ at all. In most cases, it is fairly clear what the landowners intentions are.. you can see it in the way they take care of ( or not ) the land. Recreation does not harm the land on near the same scale as say cattle. A hundred cattle can totally ruin a river bank and turn a clean stream into a mess. A 100 paddlers – even if they all urinated in unison wouldn’t even come close.
But this is true ONLY IF the 100 cattle *do* damage the riverbank. Such impacts are not really comparative in nature. Negative impacts cause by paddlers are not "better", or "less negative" impacts simply because they are caused by a paddler instead of a cow, they stand on their own, and when those impacts are unnecessary to begin with, they are that much more improper. Cattle may cause negative impacts, which can be mitigated by proper management practices, but cattle are *necessary* impacts in most cases, because they are what pay the taxes and create the profits that are used to continue to preserve the area. It’s all well and good to say "cattle-free in 2003" or whatever (though this mostly applies to federal lands) but the bills have to get paid somehow. I suppose when paddlers fork over the thousands of dollars a year to pay the taxes and maintain the property, then I’ll consider allowing them to trespass. Until then, their impacts, however slight, are *not necessary* to the preservation of the resource, and therefore they are justifiably banned. I’am also amused by the ’scaring the wildlife’ argument – somewhat because there may be a ‘hint’ of truth for some species but how many species in the last few decades have been not only ’scared’ but just plain wiped-out because the habitat they lived on was used by the landowner for ‘other purposes’?
Again, you are comparing apples and oranges. The fact that species and habitat may have been impacted by landowners is a broad generalization and an irrelevant comparison. In my case this is not the case, as is true in many other places, and you cannot claim that your impacts are legitimate merely because other impacts occur. Your impacts stand alone, on their own merits, and you are not excused by the bad behavior of others. Using your logic, you should be able to toss beer cans on the bank, leave rubbish around and cut down trees for firewood just because somebody else does so somewhere else. That’s fallacious logic at best. If the ’scaring the wildlife’ arugment were true then most of the official ‘wild & scenic’ rivers in this nation – which are heavily travelled by recreation paddlers – would be completely devoid of wildlife. The reverse is true – once the land is dedicated by recreational use ONLY – the wildlife return and thrive.. and with the exception of certain ’shy’ species become confortable with humans – especially if they are not shooting them. It’s not the presence of the human itself that disturbs most animals – it is WHAT the human is doing and animals *know* that there is risk is hanging around.
This is simply not true. No one said that the riparian zone would become ‘devoid’ of life, and while wildlife may become habituated to some degree, the stresses of human intrusion *remain* to negatively affect populations and vigor. And that wildlife you may see, which may be habituated, ignores those "shy" species, which are in the majority, which may indeed leave the area altogether, or may simply begin a gradual decline. Our federal lands are managed for *multiple* use with the recognition that humans *will* have impacts, and those impacts are balanced against the benefits which accrue to the public. Factually, from a political point of view, it would be highly desireable to simply forbid human access to *most* wilderness areas in order to preserve the habitat, but it’s politically impossible to do so, so we instead try to mitigate the impacts we do have. That’s why permit systems are cropping up on more and more rivers. The impacts of scale have become clear and limitations are required to preserve the resource. Those impacts are just as present on Boulder Creek, though to a lesser degree. The difficulty is that many jurisdictions are relying upon the *** snip legal rambling **** Pity I don’t own such a parcel…..I could bring this thing to a head quite quickly…. The ‘difficulty’ is that if Colorado actually did what you suggest – that there would be a firestorm and the arugment would be over with very quickly. You would lose big time. Very significant tourism and the public’s perception of being ‘welcome’ are involved. No sane public official would even consider it.. that’ why they’re content to let it be the way it is.
Public officials don’t make the decisions, the Courts do. No amount of feverish desire in pursuit of the almighty dollar can prevent me, or someone else from filing a suit in court claiming an improper taking of private property for public use without just compensation. That’s the purpose of the Constitution, to prevent the tyranny of the majority and the infringements of the rights of the individual by the public. If I were to do as I suggest, *something* would happen, either the trespassers would be arrested, or *I* would be arrested for "illegally" preventing them from trespassing, or they would file a suit, or I would. And as soon as the matter comes to court, the LAW rules, and I am quite confident in the strength of my legal case. Regards, Scott Weiser ****** "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend upon my friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" ****** http://www.dimensional.com/~weiser/ Copyright 1998 by Scott Weiser Under the UCC, by the act of transmitting any commercial e-mail advertisment to this address, you are expressly contracting with me in my professional capacity for a consultation on the ad’s effectiveness and you expressly agree to pay to me the sum of $250.00 for each such consultation within 10 days of my report to the original sending address. You further expressly agree that all actions for recovery of fees owed shall be subject solely to the laws of the State of Colorado, which shall have sole jurisdiction.
Response:
Correct, and the point is that *somebody* just might own such places, and you could lose the access in a heartbeat due to the malefactions of one or two individual paddlers.
yep – actually this is more common that most folks either know or will admit. In Virginia – The Cowpasture River ( not great whitewater but a really beautify mountain river) is essentially off-limits. Others include Back Creek and the Jackson. Had a little old lady point a long-barreled 45 at our group on the Bullpasture. She wanted us off of "her damned land" NOW! People have been arrested in the past and many others are "warned" by local landowners before they even put in. Interestingly, we *used* to be able to get permission from the landowner group for a number of years and then suddenly we were refused. Not because we had done anything wrong – we ALWAYS sought permission and ALWAYS were polite – but because 1 landowner out of dozens didn’t want ANYBODY and didn’t care whether they were polite or respectful or anything else. End of story. All of years of carefully trying to not step on anyones toes went for naught. Um….I think this qualifies as a "broad generalization" of the type which Richard was objecting to when applied to paddlers, so I guess I have to object to it when applied to "landowners". After all, my purpose is not to develop or destroy the resource, it’s to protect it from the damage caused by public use.
yep, i erred in the generalization. there is a link however. I don’t buy your ‘protection’ argument. I’ve paddled hundreds of rivers in 30 years of boating and damage, if any, is miniscule compared to cattle, 4 wheelers, local trash dumps, roadside dumps, fishermen – believe it of not!, logging, farming, and industry. Actually, of late, many rivers have been saved from damage by pointing out that they are used significantly for recreation. also interesting is that once a River becomes officially protected and becomes a destination for paddlers – the localities reap economic benefit AND the river then becomes essentially off-limits to single-minded proposals that *would* damage it. It’s a delicate balance of the two, but remember that preserving to pass stewardship on does *not* necessarily mean passing it to the public who want to use the land for recreation.
I don’t think it is a ‘delicate balance’ at all. In most cases, it is fairly clear what the landowners intentions are.. you can see it in the way they take care of ( or not ) the land. Recreation does not harm the land on near the same scale as say cattle. A hundred cattle can totally ruin a river bank and turn a clean stream into a mess. A 100 paddlers – even if they all urinated in unison wouldn’t even come close. I’am also amused by the ’scaring the wildlife’ argument – somewhat because there may be a ‘hint’ of truth for some species but how many species in the last few decades have been not only ’scared’ but just plain wiped-out because the habitat they lived on was used by the landowner for ‘other purposes’? If the ’scaring the wildlife’ arugment were true then most of the official ‘wild & scenic’ rivers in this nation – which are heavily travelled by recreation paddlers – would be completely devoid of wildlife. The reverse is true – once the land is dedicated by recreational use ONLY – the wildlife return and thrive.. and with the exception of certain ’shy’ species become confortable with humans – especially if they are not shooting them. It’s not the presence of the human itself that disturbs most animals – it is WHAT the human is doing and animals *know* that there is risk is hanging around. The difficulty is that many jurisdictions are relying upon the
*** snip legal rambling **** Pity I don’t own such a parcel…..I could bring this thing to a head quite quickly….
The ‘difficulty’ is that if Colorado actually did what you suggest – that there would be a firestorm and the arugment would be over with very quickly. You would lose big time. Very significant tourism and the public’s perception of being ‘welcome’ are involved. No sane public official would even consider it.. that’ why they’re content to let it be the way it is. Absolutely correct, and only by dialog between landowners and river users can such conflicts be peacefully and properly resolved with benefit to everyone.
I actually agree with the basic premise that no one is guanranteed access to private land because they are engaging in what they perceive as a ‘noble’ activity. Usually, it’s scumballs who cloak themselves with the ‘noble activity’ and then abuse the landowner. We’ve seen it with hunting and to some extent with boating. I’ve always subscribed to the idea that if someone owns the land that *I* need to *ask permission* and if they refuse – they refuse. It is their right. It burns my butt when 99 paddlers are polite and ask permission and then Mr asshole waltz’s in and screws it up for everybody. Folks from the ‘big’ cities are often the worst offenders. For some odd reason, I’ve never been able to understand they think they are ‘entitled’ to treaspass once in the rural landscape. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Regards, Scott Weiser ****** "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend upon my friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" ****** http://www.dimensional.com/~weiser/ Copyright 1998 by Scott Weiser Under the UCC, by the act of transmitting any commercial e-mail advertisment to this address, you are expressly contracting with me in my professional capacity for a consultation on the ad’s effectiveness and you expressly agree to pay to me the sum of $250.00 for each such consultation within 10 days of my report to the original sending address. You further expressly agree that all actions for recovery of fees owed shall be subject solely to the laws of the State of Colorado, which shall have sole jurisdiction.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I am willing to conceed to Scott that there is a valid interest in these dicussions on this newsgroup, but I do wish I could make the "NOT weiser" boolean search request work on my newsreader client. The problem I have with these posts is that Scott seems to be preoccupied with preaching legal findings and citing past relevant rulings to paddlers that are responding back with statements like "If I can paddle it, the river is navigable!" and "Just try to stop me!". Reading these threads is like sitting in a nicely furnished living room watching an acclaimed vet scold his dog by using the following phrase…"Sparky, the reason you should not urinate on the carpet is because the acidic nature of your fluid excrement has an adverse effect on both the optical appearance of this synthetic-based floor covering and also tends to react unpleasantly with the olfactory processes of myself and my house guests. Please, Sparky, give me a reason why I should not confine you to your pre-designated travel container." Whereas, the more intelligent vet, the person that learns through careful observation would say "Bad Dog, go to your box.", realizing that dogs do not make for good argument.
ROTFLMAO. What a hoot….I had not thought to compare kayakers to untrainable dogs. I sort of thought by presenting the evidence in (hopefully) a manner which the average adult could understand, that people would discover the logic involved themselves and make good decisions based upon that knowledge. I’ve had quite a bit of evidence that this is indeed the case. While you may tire of repetition (as I do), there is a constant stream of people who *don’t* understand and might like to who deserve to be informed of the controversy and the facts surrounding it so that they, too, can make informed decisions. My suggestion is that those who know the material and have made the decision, one way or the other, simply skip the threads altogether and allow those who *are* interested debate the matter with me in peace and quiet. Unfortunately, those who have seen the material cannot seem to control themselves and insist on insulting me and interrupting valid and interesting conversations among others. It’s a lot like a high-school student running into a class full of 8th graders and shouting "Hey, teach, shut the **ck up! I’ve heard all this before and you annoy me!" Why can’t those who don’t like the nature of the discussion simply switch off and go for a paddle and leave those who wish to discuss alone? I suspect it’s because such people are violently opposed to my particular argument and see it as dangerous, and decide to do whatever they can to disrupt the flow of information. It’s a lame attempt at censorship, nothing more, and I’ll tell you here and now it won’t work. I guess what I am trying to say here is that the best communicators are the ones that can tailor a response, argumentative or otherwise, to the intended audience. Make your point and make it clear. There is nothing wrong with being a highly intelligent, well versed, individual, but make no mistake…a highly- intelligent, well-versed idiot is still an idiot. Finally, Scott, if you feel the need to reply to this posting, I will assume that you deem me a colleague worth engaging with in meaningful debate. If your words truly express your feelings about me…
I think you have made a trenchant statement of fact, and I appreciate your candor. I hope that my reply is likewise informative. We agree more than we disagree, but I have a policy about "Shut the **ck UP!" threads, which is that I reply to them with whatever degree of politeness is called for until those posting to the thread….shut the **ck up. Then I return to the adult debates about access issues and the law with those who wish to discuss the issue. When nobody cares to discuss it anymore, then the thread dies and I retreat to my place under the bridge for a time, until some event stimulates me to begin again, for a new crop of paddlers who may be in need of enlightenment. (Your Previous Posting) <CLIP If you don’t like the course of the conversation, then toddle off and start one of your own instead of sniping at the adults who are having an interesting discussion. You sound like a three-year-old who’s whining and throwing a temper tantrum because Mommy is ignoring you. <CLIP …then why do you bother post a reply, I personally do not waste my time reasoning with someone that sounded like a spoiled three-year-old.
It’s not for *their* benefit, it’s for the benefit of others, and for my own amusement. If you do repond and I do not, please do not feel bad. Sometimes I go out and paddle instead of talking about it in this newsgroup.
Good plan. BTW- I apologize for the YELLING in my first post, it was uncalled for.
No problem, I’m a very forgiving kind of guy. Regards, Scott Weiser ****** "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend upon my friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" ****** http://www.dimensional.com/~weiser/ Copyright 1998 by Scott Weiser Under the UCC, by the act of transmitting any commercial e-mail advertisment to this address, you are expressly contracting with me in my professional capacity for a consultation on the ad’s effectiveness and you expressly agree to pay to me the sum of $250.00 for each such consultation within 10 days of my report to the original sending address. You further expressly agree that all actions for recovery of fees owed shall be subject solely to the laws of the State of Colorado, which shall have sole jurisdiction.
Response:
Hey, hey. We should be counting our blessings. Suppose Mr. Weiser owned the put-in to the Ocoee or Chatooga?
Correct, and the point is that *somebody* just might own such places, and you could lose the access in a heartbeat due to the malefactions of one or two individual paddlers. Paddlers need to know about folks like him AND how he thinks. Mr. Weiser is representative of many ‘landowner rights’ advocates some of whom also belong to the ‘Wise Use’ groups. They usually not only want to keep paddlers off the rivers but they want to develop their land in any way they please even if it destroys natural resources.
Um….I think this qualifies as a "broad generalization" of the type which Richard was objecting to when applied to paddlers, so I guess I have to object to it when applied to "landowners". After all, my purpose is not to develop or destroy the resource, it’s to protect it from the damage caused by public use. Some folks think if they own land that it ‘ALL MINE’ and I can do with it what I want while others see themselves as temporary stewards responsible for passing the land on to others to also will practice stewardship.
It’s a delicate balance of the two, but remember that preserving to pass stewardship on does *not* necessarily mean passing it to the public who want to use the land for recreation. It is a significant movement and unless paddlers and others become involved and pay attention – you’ll see more and more rivers placed off-limits. I’m amazed that if Colorado Law is what Mr. Weiser sez it is that ANY rivers out there can be accessed legally. Something doesn’t fit. I wonder how popular rivers fare on the access issue in that state.
The difficulty is that many jurisdictions are relying upon the Attorney General’s opinion of the effects of changing the definition of "premises", including the state Department of Natural Resources, which leads to inconsistent enforcement of the law and a misunderstanding of the law itself. The issue is still unresolved because no case has been brought to overturn the AG’s opinion and confirm the Emmert Court’s decision. I hope it won’t come to that, because such a ruling would *shut down* public recreational use of most of the important recreational waters of the state, including the Number section of the Arkansas, which, while most of it is on BLM or Forest Service land, is criss-crossed by private "inholdings", any one of which could choose at any time to prohibit trespass and thereby destroy the ability to complete the float at all, since there’s no way to egress at the closed properties. This is why I propose a system which allows the state to, in this example, *condemn* a recreational easement if necessary to assure continued access to the entire run. But the essential part is that the state must *pay for* the access. After all, commercial whitewater recreation on the Arkansas is a multi-million dollar industry, which makes that easement quite valuable. I’ve suggested before the possibility that a landowner who owns a strip of land under the river somewhere in the middle of the popular section could simply take photos of every commercial raft which passes by in a season, identify the outfitter, count the number of heads and send them a bill at, say, $5.00 a head for a "trespass fee." I imagine this would get the attention of the recreational community rather quickly. Pity I don’t own such a parcel…..I could bring this thing to a head quite quickly…. The thread has been excellent raising awareness and I’ll bet more than a few now realize how important it is to contribute/join the AWA who works on behalf paddlers on access issues.
Absolutely correct, and only by dialog between landowners and river users can such conflicts be peacefully and properly resolved with benefit to everyone. Regards, Scott Weiser ****** "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend upon my friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" ****** http://www.dimensional.com/~weiser/ Copyright 1998 by Scott Weiser Under the UCC, by the act of transmitting any commercial e-mail advertisment to this address, you are expressly contracting with me in my professional capacity for a consultation on the ad’s effectiveness and you expressly agree to pay to me the sum of $250.00 for each such consultation within 10 days of my report to the original sending address. You further expressly agree that all actions for recovery of fees owed shall be subject solely to the laws of the State of Colorado, which shall have sole jurisdiction.
Response:
Shut Up, Shut up, Shut Up!!! For the love of God people please stop this nonesense. Like everyone else I give a damn but I’m F%#$ing tired of seeing all these lame Wesier posts. Dear lord have mercy on our souls!! T.J.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hey, hey. We should be counting our blessings. Suppose Mr. Weiser owned the put-in to the Ocoee or Chatooga? Paddlers need to know about folks like him AND how he thinks. Mr. Weiser is representative of many ‘landowner rights’ advocates some of whom also belong to the ‘Wise Use’ groups. They usually not only want to keep paddlers off the rivers but they want to develop their land in any way they please even if it destroys natural resources. Some folks think if they own land that it ‘ALL MINE’ and I can do with it what I want while others see themselves as temporary stewards responsible for passing the land on to others to also will practice stewardship. It is a significant movement and unless paddlers and others become involved and pay attention – you’ll see more and more rivers placed off-limits. I’m amazed that if Colorado Law is what Mr. Weiser sez it is that ANY rivers out there can be accessed legally. Something doesn’t fit. I wonder how popular rivers fare on the access issue in that state. The thread has been excellent raising awareness and I’ll bet more than a few now realize how important it is to contribute/join the AWA who works on behalf paddlers on access issues.
I will go against the spirit of my original post and add a few more coals to the fire. Larry, you make a good point here. It is important that people reading this newsgroup realize the opinions of Scott and landowners like him. I do admit that I skimmed over the legal content of your posting pretty lightly, because I myself (speaking only for myself) do not give much consideration to written law while paddling. Not to say that I am a scofflaw, I just rely on simple common sense and judgement when leaving the city for a relaxing paddling trip. In my opinion, many access laws are on the books for liability reasons. There is a certain river here in the Southeast, that is officially banned from access. I have been told by local law enforcement officials that they do not particularly mind paddlers on the river, nor do they bother them if the right attitude is excercised by the group. The law was enacted to protect the state in the event of an unforseen accident. When I paddle, I paddle until told not to. If a local landowner expresses their concern in my paddling, I respect their wishes. If I should get arrested and am legally "in the wrong", I pay my fine and do not visit that particular area again. This approach has not failed me yet. Mutual respect goes quite a long way here in the Southeast. Maybe things are different in Colorado, I really do not know. I am not saying we should feel that we have the right to paddle anywhere. I am simply saying that 9 times out of ten, if you are not making a problem for anyone, people usually do not make problems for you. If Mr. Weiser’s family property on Boulder Creek contains a fence to control livestock, and by Colorado law they have a right to maintain that fence, then I would say paddling that section does impose a problem on someone, so it shold be avoided. It is quite possible that if there was no need for the fence, the Weisers may not care if their property is paddled across, who knows, it does not really matter. If I am paddling down a "legal" creek and a trout fisherman has inadvertantly snagged his line across the river, I wait, or help, or get out and walk around. I do not care who is or is not supposed to be there. (enough rambling, I will try to make my point here.) I am willing to conceed to Scott that there is a valid interest in these dicussions on this newsgroup, but I do wish I could make the "NOT weiser" boolean search request work on my newsreader client. The problem I have with these posts is that Scott seems to be preoccupied with preaching legal findings and citing past relevant rulings to paddlers that are responding back with statements like "If I can paddle it, the river is navigable!" and "Just try to stop me!". Reading these threads is like sitting in a nicely furnished living room watching an acclaimed vet scold his dog by using the following phrase…"Sparky, the reason you should not urinate on the carpet is because the acidic nature of your fluid excrement has an adverse effect on both the optical appearance of this synthetic-based floor covering and also tends to react unpleasantly with the olfactory processes of myself and my house guests. Please, Sparky, give me a reason why I should not confine you to your pre-designated travel container." Whereas, the more intelligent vet, the person that learns through careful observation would say "Bad Dog, go to your box.", realizing that dogs do not make for good argument. I guess what I am trying to say here is that the best communicators are the ones that can tailor a response, argumentative or otherwise, to the intended audience. Make your point and make it clear. There is nothing wrong with being a highly intelligent, well versed, individual, but make no mistake…a highly- intelligent, well-versed idiot is still an idiot. Finally, Scott, if you feel the need to reply to this posting, I will assume that you deem me a colleague worth engaging with in meaningful debate. If your words truly express your feelings about me… (Your Previous Posting) <CLIP If you don’t like the course of the conversation, then toddle off and start one of your own instead of sniping at the adults who are having an interesting discussion. You sound like a three-year-old who’s whining and throwing a temper tantrum because Mommy is ignoring you.
<CLIP …then why do you bother post a reply, I personally do not waste my time reasoning with someone that sounded like a spoiled three-year-old. If you do repond and I do not, please do not feel bad. Sometimes I go out and paddle instead of talking about it in this newsgroup. BTW- I apologize for the YELLING in my first post, it was uncalled for. SYOTR (well maybe 99.9% of you) -Craig
Response:
From, Mick "Better to be paddlin’ hard than hardly paddlin’ "
Response:
I think it’s kind of funny. Near the beginning of the great return of Weiser, everyone was more or less agreeing with him. Now he’s isolated himself against the NG again by posting more to this newsgroup on a few days than I have since I’ve started looking at it.
Of course, the slingers of insults who *start* the threads have *nothing* to do with it…..not… If only the "vocal minority" were able to leave well enough alone, then perhaps these pyrotechnic offshoots wouldn’t happen, but of course, unable to audit their conduct, they just *have* to get a dig in there. Well, poke me and I poke right back. You want it to stop, you stop it. Regards, Scott Weiser ****** "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend upon my friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" ****** http://www.dimensional.com/~weiser/ Copyright 1998 by Scott Weiser Under the UCC, by the act of transmitting any commercial e-mail advertisment to this address, you are expressly contracting with me in my professional capacity for a consultation on the ad’s effectiveness and you expressly agree to pay to me the sum of $250.00 for each such consultation within 10 days of my report to the original sending address. You further expressly agree that all actions for recovery of fees owed shall be subject solely to the laws of the State of Colorado, which shall have sole jurisdiction.
Response:
Hey, hey. We should be counting our blessings. Suppose Mr. Weiser owned the put-in to the Ocoee or Chatooga? Paddlers need to know about folks like him AND how he thinks. Mr. Weiser is representative of many ‘landowner rights’ advocates some of whom also belong to the ‘Wise Use’ groups. They usually not only want to keep paddlers off the rivers but they want to develop their land in any way they please even if it destroys natural resources. Some folks think if they own land that it ‘ALL MINE’ and I can do with it what I want while others see themselves as temporary stewards responsible for passing the land on to others to also will practice stewardship. It is a significant movement and unless paddlers and others become involved and pay attention – you’ll see more and more rivers placed off-limits. I’m amazed that if Colorado Law is what Mr. Weiser sez it is that ANY rivers out there can be accessed legally. Something doesn’t fit. I wonder how popular rivers fare on the access issue in that state. The thread has been excellent raising awareness and I’ll bet more than a few now realize how important it is to contribute/join the AWA who works on behalf paddlers on access issues.
Response:
I apologize in advance, but there really is no diplomatic way to state this… ENOUGH WITH THE DAMN ACCESS DEBATE THREADS!
Thank you for that trenchant commentary. I am a kayaker. I view and post to this newsgroup in order to keep abreast of new happenings in the sport I love.
And access debates have nothing to do with your sport? Boy, are you deluded. And just what makes you think that anyone else is obliged to give a rodent’s fundamental orifice about why YOU choose to participate here or what YOU like or want? When I see three postings (or threads) involving a river access issue, I think "Good debate, there have been some valid issues presented here". When I see thirty posts, mostly by one individual, I think "These (expletive’in) people have nothing better to do with their time."
Well, I do rather enjoy jousting with the fine folks here…and the Netwits too. It’s my time to waste though, so what’s your beef? Remember, I only post in reply to a query or discussion from someone else who, axiomatically, *is* interested in the subject. Please, If you are absolutely hot-and-bothered to the point that you are treating this news group like your own personal chat-room, I understand…But keep it private, e-mail is really an ideal medium for this type of thing. Don’t clog this otherwise interesting group with twenty different post that are essentially the same in content.
Clog the group? Have you ever heard of a concept called the "delete" key? How about the "down arrow" key? Both of them will allow you to completely bypass any discussion which might cause consternation and confusion in your tiny mind. There’s and even better one….it’s called the "OFF" switch. Use it in good health, but USE it. If the posts are the same in content, it’s because others keep asking the same questions, and as long as they do, I’ll keep responding to them because it’s the polite thing to do. For the record, Yes, I do now know that Scott Weiser(sp?) is very familiar with private domain laws in Colorado and he would prefer that kayakers show a little more respect towards his family’s legal wishes. I also know that there are a lot of disrespectful boaters out there that believe once the water droplet leaves the cloud, it is there God-given right to use it at their convenience. Well folks, these are things I learned in the first few posts. I can see both sides of the argument, but really do not give a flying (expletive)!
And so you would impose your will on everyone else, some of whom might be interested, simply because you don’t have the wit to skip a thread. How very altruistic of you. If you have any other opinions that you think I am interested in past that point, know that I am not. If any of you involved in this thread think of any other gems that need to be discussed pertaining to this topic. Please, WRITE YOUR (EXPLETIVE’IN) CONGRESSMAN OR SHUT THE (EXPLETIVE) UP!
Let me see if I can put this delicately……No. If you don’t like the course of the conversation, then toddle off and start one of your own instead of sniping at the adults who are having an interesting discussion. You sound like a three-year-old who’s whining and throwing a temper tantrum because Mommy is ignoring you. Grow up and act like an adult. Regards, Scott Weiser ****** "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend upon my friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" ****** http://www.dimensional.com/~weiser/ Copyright 1998 by Scott Weiser Under the UCC, by the act of transmitting any commercial e-mail advertisment to this address, you are expressly contracting with me in my professional capacity for a consultation on the ad’s effectiveness and you expressly agree to pay to me the sum of $250.00 for each such consultation within 10 days of my report to the original sending address. You further expressly agree that all actions for recovery of fees owed shall be subject solely to the laws of the State of Colorado, which shall have sole jurisdiction.
Response:
I think it’s kind of funny. Near the beginning of the great return of Weiser, everyone was more or less agreeing with him. Now he’s isolated himself against the NG again by posting more to this newsgroup on a few days than I have since I’ve started looking at it. "Regards," Sam Glover
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – You know, I agree with just about everything Scott said in this post. Nobody forces you to read every article on the newsgroup. Just skip over the threads you don’t like. I know we’ve gone over this subject a zillion times, but apparently we keep getting new people in the group who are not aware of the differences in access laws from place to place. Some of these people want argue with Scott, but it really won’t do them any good–they can’t change the laws of the state of Colorado. They do, however, learn from the exchanges. And for every person who posts in the thread, there are at least ten who are reading it and learning from it. If paddlers improve their behaviour wrt access, then maybe some irate landowners who have the power to block access to put-ins or even to the entire river may decide that paddlers aren’t so bad. If these threads improve our collective behaviour enough that the closure of just one river is avoided, then it will be worthwhile.
Well said. I do take issue with one of Scott’s statements, though. Remember, I only post in reply to a query or discussion from someone else who, axiomatically, *is* interested in the subject. Scott, you were the first poster on this subject. So one out of the dozens of your posts was NOT a repy. (OK, I may be picking at straws there, but read on.) Also, just the other day, you replied to a post that was completely unrelated (i.e. had nothing to do with access), and did so in a manner that seemed (to me) aimed at starting another big thread. Hence, you do not ONLY post to reply to questions about access, although I would agree that the vast majority of your posts are valid replies. If you had said that you "usually" or "generally only reply… then I would have no argument with your statement.
Well, you’ve got me there. I admit to priming the pan from time to time, but you can hardly blame me when the flash occurs. It’s possible for everyone to simply ignore my flashy lures, but it’s also highly unlikely, as I have discovered, and so I take advantage of that phenomenon to stimulate debate, and this has been another interesting and lively debate, and, as you so succintly said, some people learned something new. Whether they like what they learned, or agree with it is unimportant, what’s important is that they have had their horizons expanded, which is *always* a good thing. Regards, Scott Weiser ****** "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend upon my friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" ****** http://www.dimensional.com/~weiser/ Copyright 1998 by Scott Weiser Under the UCC, by the act of transmitting any commercial e-mail advertisment to this address, you are expressly contracting with me in my professional capacity for a consultation on the ad’s effectiveness and you expressly agree to pay to me the sum of $250.00 for each such consultation within 10 days of my report to the original sending address. You further expressly agree that all actions for recovery of fees owed shall be subject solely to the laws of the State of Colorado, which shall have sole jurisdiction.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I apologize in advance, but there really is no diplomatic way to state this… ENOUGH WITH THE DAMN ACCESS DEBATE THREADS! I am a kayaker. I view and post to this newsgroup in order to keep abreast of new happenings in the sport I love. When I see three postings (or threads) involving a river access issue, I think "Good debate, there have been some valid issues presented here". When I see thirty posts, mostly by one individual, I think "These (expletive’in) people have nothing better to do with their time." Please, If you are absolutely hot-and-bothered to the point that you are treating this news group like your own personal chat-room, I understand…But keep it private, e-mail is really an ideal medium for this type of thing. Don’t clog this otherwise interesting group with twenty different post that are essentially the same in content. For the record, Yes, I do now know that Scott Weiser(sp?) is very familiar with private domain laws in Colorado and he would prefer that kayakers show a little more respect towards his family’s legal wishes. I also know that there are a lot of disrespectful boaters out there that believe once the water droplet leaves the cloud, it is there God-given right to use it at their convenience. Well folks, these are things I learned in the first few posts. I can see both sides of the argument, but really do not give a flying (expletive)! If you have any other opinions that you think I am interested in past that point, know that I am not. If any of you involved in this thread think of any other gems that need to be discussed pertaining to this topic. Please, WRITE YOUR (EXPLETIVE’IN) CONGRESSMAN OR SHUT THE (EXPLETIVE) UP! By the way, if any of you would like to paddle this weekend, let me know
Let me out of this concrete jungle, -Craig "no playboat yet" Geist
You better watch out buddy … you started a new possible deadly feud here … you better know that Mr. Weiser is a very fast typist, commands the English language like no other, is an expert of all laws of the king’s land, he is a sharp shooter (he is also a gunsmithlike expert) and a land "king size" owner. You are doomed my friend! Scotty will beam your tired sorry paddling ass up! PS: I really felt sorry for the incident and for the two idiots that went after Mr. Weiser’s mother but this is to much! Fred Fred Mechini Visit my homepage http://pluto.njcc.com/~fmec/Welcome.html A WEB PAGE DEDICATED TO OLYMPIC SPRINT KAYAK
Response:
You know, I agree with just about everything Scott said in this post. Nobody forces you to read every article on the newsgroup. Just skip over the threads you don’t like. I know we’ve gone over this subject a zillion times, but apparently we keep getting new people in the group who are not aware of the differences in access laws from place to place. Some of these people want argue with Scott, but it really won’t do them any good–they can’t change the laws of the state of Colorado. They do, however, learn from the exchanges. And for every person who posts in the thread, there are at least ten who are reading it and learning from it. If paddlers improve their behaviour wrt access, then maybe some irate landowners who have the power to block access to put-ins or even to the entire river may decide that paddlers aren’t so bad. If these threads improve our collective behaviour enough that the closure of just one river is avoided, then it will be worthwhile. I do take issue with one of Scott’s statements, though. Remember, I only post in reply to a query or discussion from someone else who, axiomatically, *is* interested in the subject.
Scott, you were the first poster on this subject. So one out of the dozens of your posts was NOT a repy. (OK, I may be picking at straws there, but read on.) Also, just the other day, you replied to a post that was completely unrelated (i.e. had nothing to do with access), and did so in a manner that seemed (to me) aimed at starting another big thread. Hence, you do not ONLY post to reply to questions about access, although I would agree that the vast majority of your posts are valid replies. If you had said that you "usually" or "generally only reply… then I would have no argument with your statement. -Paul
Response:
I apologize in advance, but there really is no diplomatic way to state this… ENOUGH WITH THE DAMN ACCESS DEBATE THREADS! I am a kayaker. I view and post to this newsgroup in order to keep abreast of new happenings in the sport I love. When I see three postings (or threads) involving a river access issue, I think "Good debate, there have been some valid issues presented here". When I see thirty posts, mostly by one individual, I think "These (expletive’in) people have nothing better to do with their time." Please, If you are absolutely hot-and-bothered to the point that you are treating this news group like your own personal chat-room, I understand…But keep it private, e-mail is really an ideal medium for this type of thing. Don’t clog this otherwise interesting group with twenty different post that are essentially the same in content. For the record, Yes, I do now know that Scott Weiser(sp?) is very familiar with private domain laws in Colorado and he would prefer that kayakers show a little more respect towards his family’s legal wishes. I also know that there are a lot of disrespectful boaters out there that believe once the water droplet leaves the cloud, it is there God-given right to use it at their convenience. Well folks, these are things I learned in the first few posts. I can see both sides of the argument, but really do not give a flying (expletive)! If you have any other opinions that you think I am interested in past that point, know that I am not. If any of you involved in this thread think of any other gems that need to be discussed pertaining to this topic. Please, WRITE YOUR (EXPLETIVE’IN) CONGRESSMAN OR SHUT THE (EXPLETIVE) UP! By the way, if any of you would like to paddle this weekend, let me know
Let me out of this concrete jungle, -Craig "no playboat yet" Geist
Response:
Related Posts